MINUTES -
REGULAR MEETING
MUNICIPAL
MEETING ROOM
NOVEMBER 3,
2003
Chairman
Braun called to order the regular meeting of the Wall Township Planning Board
at 7:30 P.M. Members present were
Braun, Brosnan, Morris, Farrell, Wilson, Luttman, Rible, Kiley, Stacy, Attorney
Rubino, Engineer Gerken, Planner Bergailo, Planning Board Secretary Lang, Recording
Secretary Schinestuhl and Court Reporter Arnone.
Chairman
Braun announced the meeting was being held in accordance with the “Sunshine
Law” and a resolution adopted on January 13, 2003.
SALUTE TO THE FLAG
CARRIED APPLICATION
D & O ASSOCIATES - PB#30-2003 – 1670 Route 34,
Block 942, Lots 87, 38, 35 & 36, OR-2 zone. Application complete: August 13, 2003. Carried from October 27, 2003.
Timothy
B. Middleton, Esq. appeared for the applicant.
Attorney
Rubino said there was a question as to a traffic report. Our traffic expert did not have his report
ready at the previous meeting.
Entered
into evidence:
PB-9 Traffic report prepared by Nicholas Verderese, Schoor DePalma,
dated November 3, 2003
Chairman
Braun said our traffic expert concurs with the applicant’s report. This project will not have an affect on the
level of service at the intersection of Route 34 and Belmar Boulevard.
The
application was open and closed to the public.
Ms.
Wilson asked if the name will be changed.
Attorney Middleton said yes.
Chairman
Braun asked if the applicant will meet with the needs of the Police Department
regarding radio enhancement. Attorney
Middleton agreed.
Mr.
Gerken said the billboard must be removed.
Attorney Middleton said it will be.
Ms. Bergailo asked when the billboard will come down. Attorney Middleton said it will be down within
days of approval.
November
3, 2003 Page 2
Mr.
Luttman moved to approve the application for minor subdivision subject to the
payment of taxes and applicable assessments.
The applicant will comply with the requirements of Freehold Soil
Conservation District, Monmouth County Planning Board, Monmouth County Board of
Health. The applicant shall obtain
approval from NJDEP and NJDOT. The
applicant will comply with Wall Township Affordable Housing Trust Fund and ADA
requirements. The applicant shall
obtain a tree removal permit. The
applicant shall comply with the review letters of the Board Professionals. The applicant shall comply with the review
letter from Wall Township Police Department, Wall Township Fire Prevention,
Glendola Fire Company and Wall Township Environmental Advisory Committee. The applicant shall install a Knox Box
system. The applicant shall submit
application for Subtitle 1 of Title 39.
The basement shall be used for storage and mechanicals only. The applicant shall meet with Wall Township
Police Department and emergency services prior to start of construction. Façade and color is subject to Board Planner
approval. The applicant shall designate
two parking spaces for delivery only.
The project shall be renamed.
Landscaping shall be approved by Board Planner. The applicant shall install a living snow
fence screen. The applicant shall
enhance Wall Township Police Department radio system. The billboard must be removed within 30 days. Waivers are granted. Committeeman Brosnan seconded the motion
which was unanimously approved by a roll call vote. (Messrs. Luttman, Brosnan, Kiley, Morris, Rible, Ms. Wilson and
Mr. Braun voted yes.)
Ms.
Wilson stepped down on the Weir application.
DONALD & PATRICIA WEIR –
PB#6-2002 – 1616
Walnut Street, Block 118, Lot 68, HB-80 zone.
Application complete: March 8,
2003. Applicant seeks a Minor subdivision.
This applicant is remanded back from the courts for more testimony. Minor with variances.
Robert
Weir, Esq. appeared for the applicant.
Attorney
Rubino reviewed the file and stated the Board had jurisdiction to proceed.
Entered
into evidence:
A-1 Jurisdictional Items
A-2 Tax map of minor subdivision
A-3 Order from Superior Court remanding this
application back to the Planning Board
Attorney
Rubino said this matter has been remanded back to the Planning Board by Judge
Lawson. This application was before the
Board in 2002. The Board denied the
application. It was appealed. It was sent back to the Planning Board for
additional testimony. Because this
Board has new members we will allow the applicant to testify. The objectors will also be allowed to
present evidence.
Entered
into evidence:
PB-1 Review letter from Cheryl Bergailo, Schoor
DePalma, dated July 2, 2003
November
3, 2003 Page
3
Sworn
by Reporter Arnone: Donald
Weir
Patricia
Weir
James
Higgins, Planner
Glenn
Gerken, Engineer
Cheryl
Bergailo, Planner
James
Higgins, Planner, gave his credentials which were accepted by the Board.
Mr.
Higgins said he looked at the proposed subdivision. Mr. Higgins explained the existing lot is in both the R-10 zone
and R-7.5 zone. The existing lot has
frontage on Walnut Street and goes through to Juliette Drive. The Walnut Street lot will be slightly over
10,000 s.f. which would fully conform. The Juliette Drive lot would be 6,250 s.f. which is less than what
is required. Variances are needed for
lot width and lot frontage. The Walnut
Street lot, new lot 68.01, would have an area of 14,727 s.f. The variance for frontage is an existing
condition. The frontage is 46.48’ where
75’ is required. Ms. Bergailo said
there are no variances needed for proposed lot 68.01.
Mr.
Higgins said the Master Plan shows an R-10 zone as high density
residential. Lot 68.02 is in a high
density residential zone. It is
consistent with the Master Plan.
Chairman
Braun said the neighbors got involved at the last meeting regarding the size of
the house. Mr. Higgins said the house
would be set back 35’ from Juliette Drive.
The side yard setback to the south would be 7.5’ and to the north
10’. That is an improvement. The house will be 2200 s.f. The height will be 28’. Mr. Higgins said he did a survey of the area
regarding setbacks.
Entered
into evidence:
A-4 Rendering of existing lot frontage
A-5 Rendering of existing lot area
Mr.
Higgins said he surveyed a 14 block area.
35.6% of the houses have frontage which are not conforming. 28% are equal to or less than what the
applicant is proposing. 64 lots are not
conforming, 51 have equal or less than 50’ lot frontage. Over 33% are not conforming. 27% have area that is smaller than what is
required. Non-conforming lots are both
clustered and isolated. It is the
character of the area. A number of the
lots on Juliette are 10,000 s.f.
Mr.
Higgins explained a through lot is a lot which has frontage on both
streets. It runs through from one
street to the other which is parallel to one another.
Mr.
Higgins stated the application is consistent with the Master Plan. The zoning in this area is not consistent
with the Master Plan. Lot 68.02 has no
density now. Lot 68.02 is
underutilized. The area has water and
sewer. It has street access. To leave it vacant would be an inappropriate
use of the land. The applicant is
proposing a nice, attractive residence on the site. There is no significant negative impact. The benefits of granting this out way the
non-approval.
November
3, 2003 Page
4
Attorney
Rubino said the Board takes into consideration the change in zone.
Chairman
Braun said this application will be carried to December 1, 2003. Attorney Weir waived the time limits.
Entered
into evidence:
A-6 New rendering of proposed home
Committeeman
Brosnan asked the applicant to review the homes on Juliette with 50’ or less
frontage. He asked the applicant to
have that information for the next meeting.
Chairman
Braun said no further noticing is required.
Ms.
Wilson returned to the meeting.
THE JERALD DEVELOPMENT GROUP
– PB#24-2003 –
2510 Ramshorn Drive, Block 893, Lot 5, R-60 zone. Application complete – June 23, 2003. Carried from October 6, 2003.
Applicant requests permission to subdivide and create four single family
lots.
Jennifer
Krimko, Esq. appeared for the applicant.
Entered
into evidence:
A-13 Letter from Gregory Hnat, Jerald Development, dated September 29,
2003 stating they are applying to NJDEP for a treatment works approval for
sewer service
A-14 Preliminary & Final Major Subdivision drawings prepared by
John Vincenti last revised July 22, 2002
PB-7 Review letter from Cheryl Bergailo, Schoor
DePalma, dated October 27, 2003
PB-8 Review letter from Glenn Gerken, Schoor
DePalma, dated November 3, 2003
Attorney
Krimko said they enhanced the landscaping and buffering. They are the only changes to the plans.
Mr.
Vincenti, previously sworn, said at the northerly property line there are
natural evergreen and it is heavily buffered.
Attorney
Krimko asked if the applicant can comply with all of the review letters. Mr. Vincenti said yes.
Chairman
Braun asked for the applicant to discuss the conservation easement. Attorney Krimko said the applicant will
comply with whatever the Board’s Professionals recommend. We will deed the easement to the township.
November
3, 2003 Page
5
Mr.
Vincenti said the area in question is on a single lot. It is 250’ in length. The easement starts at the easterly property
line and runs 12’ off the property line.
He explained 50’ of the retaining wall will be on lot 5.04. The easement will be maintained by the
property owner of lot 5.04. Lot 5.05
will belong to the township.
Chairman
Braun said the Board feels that the retaining wall would be better off being
maintained by the property owner or an association. Mr. Vincenti explained lot 5.04 will have the whole retaining
wall. We could deed restrict that
portion so it cannot be subdivided.
Chairman Braun suggested moving the property line to the west to hold
the full retaining wall and fence.
Attorney
Krimko said lot 5.01 will have a detention basin. We can keep it as part of lot 5.01 or deed it to the
township. Chairman Braun said to leave
it the way it is.
Attorney
Krimko said the applicant can comply with most of the suggestions in the Board
Professional’s review letters. The only
thing we cannot comply with is having a landscape architect. We are asking for a waiver for that. Attorney Rubino said if the Engineer is not
satisfied with the landscape plan you will need a landscape architect.
Mr.
Vincenti said they will limit the clearing of trees. They will install a snow fence showing the clearing lines.
Captain
Morris asked if the sign is being moved from the site triangle. Mr. Vincenti said yes.
Captain
Morris asked about curbing. Mr.
Vincenti said it will be angled lay down.
The
application was open to the public.
Frances
Pilot, Lakewood Road, was sworn. Ms.
Pilot asked what the retaining wall will be made of. Mr. Vincenti said it will be a concrete block wall. Ms. Pilot asked if a fence would be on top
of it. Mr. Vincenti said there will be
a 4’ high chain link fence on top for safety.
Ms. Pilot asked how long the retaining wall will be. Mr. Vincenti said 310’. Ms. Pilot asked how far it will be from the
property line. Mr. Vincenti said about
10’. Ms. Pilot asked about the trees
behind the wall. Mr. Vincenti said the
trees that are there now will remain.
Ms.
Pilot asked about the detention basin.
What are the requirements to take care of it? Mr. Vincenti said the property owner has to take care of it like
any other lawn. He said every two weeks
the property owner will go down and clean out any leaves. Ms. Pilot asked how deep the basin is. Mr. Vincenti said about 2’. Attorney Rubino asked about a maintenance
schedule. Mr. Vincenti said they will
have a maintenance manual. Once the manual
is approved by the engineer it will be given to the property owner. Mr. Gerken said it should be spelt out in
the deed.
Ms.
Pilot asked when construction will begin.
Mr. Vincenti said subject to the township’s approval it should begin
within 6 – 9 months, early to mid summer.
November
3, 2003 Page
6
Alex
Tsoukalis, 2516 – A Ramshorn Drive, was sworn.
Mr. Tsoukalis said the rear of his house is on the south portion of this
development. The setbacks are 50’. He said he would like to see a 50 – 80’
buffer and have it deed restricted so they don’t come and take down that
buffer. Attorney Krimko said there is
no residence to residence buffer requirement.
The homeowner should have the right to place a structure on the site as
long as it is within the legal requirements.
Attorney Rubino said there is nothing in our ordinance requiring a
buffer between residences. Chairman
Braun said the buffer will be up to the homeowner. They can take down any trees that they want. We can’t do anything about that. We don’t buffer residence to residence. Attorney Rubino said the Board has no
authority to do that. The applicant has
to come in and apply for a tree removal permit. There will be markings.
Once the house is built we cannot make the homeowner keep the trees.
Stan
Katz, 1523 Lakewood Road, was sworn.
Mr. Katz said he is behind the retaining wall. He said there is no green behind him. Mr. Vincenti said there is some room for some small
plantings. We can put some in.
Mr.
Katz asked if there was going to be a fence around the basin. Mr. Vincenti said no. Chairman Braun said it is only 2’ deep.
Mr.
Katz asked what does it mean to deed restrict a lot. Chairman Braun said that includes a number of things. The lot cannot be subdivided. It states the ownership of the retaining
wall. It will also state no structures
can go on that lot.
The
application was closed to the public.
Mr.
Luttman moved to approve the application for major subdivision subject to
payment of taxes and applicable assessments.
The applicant will comply with the requirements of Freehold Soil
Conservation District, Monmouth County Planning Board and Monmouth County Board
of Health. The applicant will obtain
approval from NJDEP and NJDOT. The
applicant will comply with Wall Township Affordable Housing Trust Fund. The applicant must obtain a tree removal
permit. The applicant will comply with
review letters from the Board Professionals.
The applicant will comply with the review letter from Wall Township Fire
Prevention dated July 11, 2003. The
applicant must remove the existing home.
The applicant must apply for the necessary street opening permits. The applicant shall meet with the Wall
Township Police Department prior to construction. Tree clearing will be subject to Board Engineer approval. A maintenance manual for the detention basin
shall be submitted to Board Engineer for approval. The applicant shall remove the entrance signs. Lot 5.05 shall be deed restricted. Waivers are granted. Mr. Rible seconded the motion which was
unanimously approved by a roll call vote.
(Messrs. Luttman, Rible, Brosnan, Farrell, Kiley, Morris, Mesdames Stacy
and Wilson and Mr. Braun voted yes.)
NEW APPLICATIONS:
JOHN D. PITTENGER BUILDER,
INC. – PB#32-2003 – 1920 Highway 35, Block
151, Lots 10, 24, 26, & 27, HB-80 zone.
Application complete: August 29, 2003.
Applicant is seeking
November
3, 2003 Page
7
approval
to subdivide property. Minor with
variances.
Attorney
Rubino reviewed the file and stated the Board had jurisdiction to proceed.
Dwight
Pittenger, Esq. appeared for the applicant.
Entered
into evidence:
A-1 Jurisdictional Items
A-2 Minor subdivision plan prepared by
Kenderian Zilinski dated May 8, 2003
A-3 Monmouth County Board of Health review letter
A-4 Monmouth County Planning Board review
letter
PB-1 Review letter from John Hoffmann, Township
Planner, dated September 18, 2003
PB-2 Review letter from Glenn Gerken, Schoor
DePalma, dated October 1, 2003
Sworn
by Reporter Arnone: John
Pittenger
Glenn
Gerken, Engineer
Cheryl
Bergailo, Planner
Attorney
Pittenger said this application does not propose any development at this
time. The property is on Highway
35. He said they are here to develop
municipal boundary. Attorney Pittenger
explained they are proposing to reduce lot 25 in size. It will allow lot 2 in Spring Lake Heights
to have a back yard. We are proposing
to eliminate all the lot lines in Wall Township to make one lot. Lot 25.01 will be attached to lot 2 & 43
in Spring Lake Heights. Attorney
Pittenger said Ms. Siegel, Wall Township Tax Assessor, said the new lot would
go to Spring Lake Heights. Through an
assessor’s agreement Spring Lake Heights would collect taxes for the small
lot. This meets all zoning
requirements.
Ms.
Wilson said an assessor’s agreement is being done instead of a direct
transfer. Attorney Pittenger said yes.
Ms.
Wilson asked if the applicant can comply with Mr. Hoffmann’s review
letter. Attorney Pittenger said he has
reviewed that letter and they have no problems complying.
Ms.
Wilson stated, referring to Mr. Hoffmann’s review letter, no variances are
needed for lot frontage on lot 25.01 because it will be merged with block 43
lot 2 in Spring Lake Heights.
Ms.
Wilson, referring to Mr. Gerken’s review letter, asked for testimony regarding
the disposition of the existing fence on lot 25. Attorney Pittenger said the fence will be removed. There is no buffer needed at this time. Lot 25.01 will just be a backyard.
The
application was open to the public.
November
3, 2003 Page
8
Tom
Barth, Block 151, Lot 31, was sworn.
Mr. Barth said his understanding is that there is a 50’ buffer
required. Mr. Gerken said just on
commercial sites. Attorney Rubino said
the applicant is not developing that property now. You will be notified if and when he does. We are only talking about taking a piece of
property and adding it to lot 25. There
is no other application before the Board.
Chairman Braun stated we have a commercial buffer requirement and it is
75’. He cannot clear the lot now. Attorney Pittenger said at this time there
is nothing additional before this Board.
The
application was closed to the public.
Ms.
Wilson moved to approve the application for minor subdivision subject to the payment
of taxes and applicable assessments.
The applicant will comply with the requirements of Monmouth County
Planning Board and Monmouth County Board of Health. The applicant shall comply with the review letters of the Board
Professionals. The applicant shall
comply with John Hoffmann’s letter dated September 18, 2003 as amended. The existing fence on lot 25 will be
removed. Lot 25.01 will be merged with
lot 2, block 43 in Spring Lake Heights.
The proposed subdivision will be perfected by filing of a map. Pins shall be set at the rear corners of
proposed lot 25.01. Appropriate
approvals are required from Spring Lake Heights. The merged lot will require an assessor’s agreement for taxing
purposes. Variances and waivers are
granted. Mr. Farrell seconded the
motion which was unanimously approved by a roll call vote. (Ms. Wilson, Messrs. Farrell, Brosnan,
Kiley, Luttman, Morris, Rible, Ms. Stacy and Mr. Braun voted yes.)
COMMERCIAL REALTY &
RESOURCES – PB31-2003 – 1302 Campus Parkway, Block 930.02, Lot 1, OR-10 zone. Application complete: August 15, 2003. Applicant is proposing to construct two (2)
office buildings (combined SF 91347) with associated parking, lighting and
utilities. Site with variances.
Attorney
Rubino reviewed the file and stated the Board had jurisdiction to proceed.
Mark
Aikins, Esq. appeared for the applicant.
Attorney
Rubino said we are doing the site plan portion first and then we will do the
technical subdivision.
Entered
into evidence:
A-1 Jurisdictional Items
A-2 Preliminary & Final Site Plan drawings prepared by LGA
Engineering last revised October 16, 2003 and Architectural Plans last revised
October 16, 2003
A-3 LEIS dated February 13, 2003 prepared by
LGA Engineering
A-4 Fair Share Contribution Calculations dated February 15, 2002,
prepared by LGA Engineering
A-5 Engineer’s report and technical specifications dated July 2003
prepared by Robert McCarthy
A-6 Drainage Calculations dated July 2003 prepared by Robert
McCarthy
November 3, 2003 Page
9
A-7 Monmouth County Board of Health letter dated August 26, 2003
A-8 Monmouth County Planning Board letter dated September 8, 2003
A-9 Colored rendering sheet 4 and 7
A-10 Rendering of drawing of proposed building
A-11 Rendering of sheet 4 of 16 of site plan
A-12 Rendering of proposed technical subdivision
A-13 Rendering of plan showing existing setbacks
A-14 Rendering of sheet 5 of 16 of site plan
PB-1 Wall Township Fire Prevention letter dated August 19, 2003
PB-2 Review letter from Cheryl Bergailo, Schoor DePalma, dated
September 19, 2003
PB-3 Wall Township Fire Prevention letter dated September 19, 2003
PB-4 Review letter from Glenn Gerken, Schoor DePalma, dated September
22, 2003
PB-5 Review letter from Cheryl Bergailo, Schoor DePalma, dated
September 19, 2003
PB-6 Fair Share Contribution Calculations dated September 23, 2003
prepared by Nicholas Verderese
PB-7 Review letter from Cheryl Bergailo, Schoor DePalma, dated October
27, 2003
PB-8 Glendola Fire Company review letter dated October 27, 2003
PB-9 Review letter from Glenn Gerken, Schoor DePalma, dated November
3, 2003
TECHNICAL SUBDIVISION
COMMERCIAL REALTY &
RESOURCES – PB-34-2003 – 1302 Campus Parkway, Block 930.02, Lot 1, OR-10 zone. Application complete: August 15, 2003. Applicant seeks approval to subdivide lot 1
into two (2) lots to facilitate purchase financing. Technical subdivision
Entered into evidence:
A-1 Technical subdivision plan entitled Technical subdivision
A-2 Monmouth County Board of Health letter dated September 15, 2003
A-3 Monmouth County Planning Board letter dated September 8, 2003
PB-1 Technical Subdivision review letter prepared by Glenn Gerken,
Schoor DePalma, dated September 23, 2003
PB-2 Technical Subdivision review letter prepared by Glenn Gerken,
Schoor DePalma, dated November 3, 2003
Attorney
Aikins said the site plan consists of two buildings at Monmouth Shores
Corporate Park. Monmouth Shores
Corporate Park has been in Wall Township for 20 years. This is the last of the buildings. It is also the last of the technical subdivisions.
Sworn
by Reporter Arnone: Robert
McCarthy, Engineer
Mark
Kataryniak
David
McHenry, Architect
John
Lishak, Jr.
November
3, 2003 Page
10
Andrew
Thomas, Planner
Glenn
Gerken, Engineer
Cheryl
Bergailo, Planner
Mr.
McCarthy gave his credentials which were accepted by the Board.
Mr.
McCarthy said the site contains 9.26 acres.
It is boarded by four roads.
Wyckoff Road is to the east, Outlook is to the north, Campus Parkway is
to the west and Route 33 is to the south.
The site is wooded. The site is
located in the OR-10 zone.
Mr.
McCarthy explained the applicant is proposing two-two story office
buildings. The first building will be to
the south. It will be 61,200 s.f. The second building will be to the
north. It will be 30,200 s.f. for a
total of 91,400 s.f.
Mr.
McCarthy said the application needs two variances. The site contains 9.26 acres where 10 acres is required. The front setback required is 150’ and we
are providing 100’.
Mr.
McCarthy said a full driveway is being proposed off Outlook Drive. There will be a right in and right out. The driveway will be 30’ in width. All aisles will be 25’. There will be full circulation around both
buildings. A through access plan has
been submitted. We will loose a parking
space and make it so a truck can turn.
We are proposing one loading zone.
Building “J” will be all office space.
There will be 15,000 s.f. of storage space in the warehouse. The trash enclosures will be along the main
throughway between the buildings. They
will have easy access. 457 parking
spaces are required and 457 spaces are proposed. We will have ten handicap spaces. Parking is distributed.
Mr.
McCarthy said we meet the existing grades.
There will be no retaining walls.
There will be a dedication of ROW at Wyckoff and Route 33 for future
road improvements. The jug handle will
be removed.
Mr.
McCarthy said the drainage will go to the detention basin which was previously
installed and it will accept this drainage.
The applicant will connect to water and sewer. There will be four hydrants around the site.
Mr.
McCarthy said a sufficient amount of trees will be saved, about 17% of the
site. The lighting package will meet
township ordinance. There will be two
signs, one at the entrance and one at Campus Parkway. They will comply with township ordinance. Parking meets the building requirements.
Captain
Morris said the applicant is going to eliminate one parking space so trucks can
turn a round. Mr. McCarthy said
yes.
Captain
Morris asked how close the jug handle is to the parking. Mr. McCarthy said the jug handle will be
removed. The County Engineer has plans
to start the work in the spring.
November
3, 2003 Page
11
Chairman
Braun said if the jug handle is not removed the applicant will have to put up
some type of plantings. Attorney Aikins
asked if we can make that a condition of C.O.
We could bond for the cost of that.
Chairman Braun said the Board is okay with that.
Mr.
McCarthy said they agree to everything else in the Planner and Engineer’s
review letters.
Chairman
Braun said the Board is asking that a couple of spots in the front of the
building be reserved for deliveries.
Mr. McCarthy agreed.
Ms.
Bergailo said the applicant has to only provide 47 additional shrubs. The only additional landscaping will be in
the area of the jug handle if it is not removed. Mr. McCarthy agreed.
Mr.
McHenry gave his credentials which were accepted by the Board.
Mr.
McHenry said the nature of the buildings go together. This project is no different.
It will have the same brick and stucco.
The glazing will be the same.
The buildings will have four sides, four fronts. They will have red brick, beige stucco and
tinted glass.
Andrew
Thomas gave his credentials which were accepted by the Board.
Mr.
Thomas explained the variances. He
explained 10 acres is required in this area and we are providing 9.1 acres
after the dedication to Route 33. He
explained 150’ is required for frontage and we are providing 100’. The front yard setback was done 12 years
ago. He gave the setbacks of the other
buildings. All of them are less than
the 150’ requirement.
Mr.
Thomas said the granting of these variances will not have a negative effect on public
good. The construction of the buildings
will not crowd the site. It will be
consistent with the over all outlook.
This is one of the last properties to be developed.
The
application was open and closed to the public.
Mr.
Gerken asked if the Glendola Fire Company letter was addressed. Mr. McCarthy said we don’t have a problem
with that review letter. We will
comply. He said he addressed most of
those items.
Mr.
Farrell moved to approve the application for preliminary and final site plan
subject to payment of taxes and applicable assessments. The applicant will comply with the
requirements of Freehold Soil Conservation District, Monmouth County Planning
Board and Monmouth County Board of Health.
The applicant will obtain approval from NJDEP and NJDOT. The applicant will comply with Wall Township
Affordable Housing Trust Fund and ADA requirements. The applicant shall obtain a tree removal permit. The applicant shall comply with the review
letters of the Board Professionals. The
applicant will comply with review letters from Glendola Fire Company, Wall
Township Fire Prevention, Monmouth County Planning Board, Monmouth County Board
of Health and traffic analysis letter.
The applicant shall install a Knox Box system. The applicant shall submit application for Subtitle 1 of Title
39. Basement shall be
November
3, 2003 Page
12
used
for storage and mechanicals only. The
applicant shall meet with Wall Township Police Department prior to
construction. The applicant shall have
a meeting with Wall Township Emergency Services. Façade and color scheme shall be approved by Board Planner. Applicant shall designate two parking spaces
for delivery vehicles; this eliminates the loading zone variance. Landscape shall be enhanced and approved by
Board Planner. The jug handle must be
buffered with additional landscaping before a C.O. is issued if not removed. Variances and waivers are granted. Chairman Braun said enhancement to the
Police Department radio must also be added.
Committeeman Brosnan seconded the motion which was unanimously approved
by a roll call vote. (Messrs. Farrell,
Brosnan, Kiley, Luttman, Morris, Rible, Mesdames Stacey and Wilson and Mr.
Braun voted yes.)
Committeeman
Brosnan moved to approve the application for technical subdivision. Mr. Kiley seconded the motion which was
unanimously approved by a roll call vote.
(Messrs. Brosnan, Kiley, Brown, Luttman, Morris, Rible, Mesdames Stacy
and Wilson voted yes.)
PRZ CORPORATION – PB#6-2003
Block
954, Lot 102
Attorney
Rubino read the resolution of approval.
Mr. Luttman moved to adopt the resolution as read. Mr. Rible seconded the motion, which was
unanimously approved by a roll call vote.
(Messrs. Luttman, Rible, Brosnan, Farrell, Kiley, Morris, Ms. Wilson and
Mr. Braun voted yes.)
WALL DEVELOPMENT, LLC –
PB#27-2003
Block
277, Lot 26
Attorney
Rubino read the resolution of approval.
Mr. Luttman moved to adopt the resolution as read. Mr. Farrell seconded the motion, which was
unanimously approved by a roll call vote.
(Messrs. Luttman, Farrell, Kiley, Morris, Rible, Mesdames Stacy and
Wilson and Mr. Braun voted yes.)
MINUTES TO BE APPROVED
Ms.
Wilson moved to approve the minutes of the Regular and Workshop Meetings of September
29, 2003. Mr. Luttman seconded the motion,
which was unanimously approved by a roll call vote.
There
being no further business to come before the Board, a motion was made, seconded
and unanimously approved to adjourn the meeting at 10:40 P.M.
Respectfully
submitted,
Betty
Schinestuhl
Recording
Secretary