MINUTES -
REGULAR MEETING
MUNICIPAL
MEETING ROOM
JULY 1, 2002
Chairman
Braun called to order the regular meeting of the Wall Township Planning Board
at 7:35 P.M. Members present were
Braun, Tobia, Giardina, Kean, Thomson, Devlin, Morris, Wilson, Rible, Attorney
Rubino, Engineer Gerken, Special Planner Maczuga, Planning Board Secretary
DAndrea, Recording Secretary Betty Schinestuhl and Court Reporter Arnone.
Chairman
Braun announced the meeting was being held in accordance with the Sunshine
Law and a resolution adopted on January 7, 2002.
Chairman
Braun announced that the microphones do not work. Everyone needs to speak loudly.
CARRIED APPLICATION
WEICHERT REALTORS
PB#44-2001
2165 Route 35, Block 263, Lot 3, HB-80 zone.
Date application complete: November 13, 2001. Carried from March 25, 2002 and May 20, 2002. Applicant seeks to remodel the existing
first floor, add a second floor and reconstruct existing parking lot. Site Plan with Variance.
Attorney
Mancuso said they are withdrawing the application. Chairman Braun said the Board accepts the withdrawal without
prejudice.
Chairman
Braun announced there are three matters before the Board. The Board will hear Jost, Weir and
Montenelli.
NEW APPLICATION
ROBERT JOST - PB#16-2002 1623 Marconi Road and 1600
Wight Street, Block 113, Lots 12 and 14, R-15 Zone. Date application complete: June 18, 2002. Applicant seeks to subdivide lots 12 and 14
into two new lots. Minor subdivision
with no variances.
Attorney
Rubino reviewed the file and stated the Board had jurisdiction to proceed.
Michael
Magee, Esq. appeared for the applicant.
Mr.
Tobia stepped down on this application.
Entered
into evidence:
PB-1 Review letter from Glenn Gerken dated June
28, 2002
PB-2 Review letter from John Maczuga dated June
24, 2002
A-1 Map prepared by T. Stuart dated March 14,
2002, revised May 12, 2002
July
1, 2002 Page
2
Attorney
Magee said this is a minor subdivision with no variances. He said they do not have a problem with
complying with the review letters from the Board professionals.
Mr.
Gerken said the right-of-way makes it slightly non-conforming. He said move the lines and that will make it
conforming.
Mr.
Giardina moved to approve the application subject to payment of taxes, Monmouth
County Planning Board approval. The
applicant will comply with the requirements of Board of Health. The applicant will comply with the letters
of the Board professionals. The
driveway will be located on Wight Street.
Mr. Rible seconded the motion which was unanimously approved by a roll
call vote. (Messrs. Giardina, Rible,
Thomson, Devlin, Morris, Kean, Ms. Wilson and Mr. Braun voted yes.)
CARRIED APPLICATIONS
DONALD AND PATRICIA WEIR
PB#6-2002
1616 Walnut Street, Block 118, Lot 68, R-7.5 zone. Application complete: March 5, 2002. Carried from May 5 and May 20, 2002. Applicant seeks minor subdivision. Minor with variances.
Entered
into evidence:
PB-5 Review letter from John Maczuga dated June
20, 2002
PB-6 Review letter from John Maczuga dated June
24, 2002
PB-7 Review letter from Glenn Gerken dated June
28, 2002
PB-8 Review letter from John Hoffmann dated June
20, 2002
A-12 Elevation of proposed home
A-13 Map prepared by Kenderian-Zilinski dated
February 13, 2002, revised June 14, 2002
Attorney
Weir stated the applicant has agreed to add additional property to the Juliette
Street lot to increase the lot area.
Mr.
Weir said he would add 25 to the east portion of the property. He said it would now be 10,000 s.f.
Mr.
Weir said they will move the house from 25 to 35 from the front setback.
Mr.
Weir said the first floor would be 1500 s.f.
The exhibits showed the house to be 32 X 34. He said the total would be 1960 s.f., a little over 2000 s.f.
including the garage.
Mayor
Thomson went over the history of the property.
Mr. Pittenger said this was the last piece of property not in the
subdivision. Mayor Thomson asked if it
was purchased for a road. Attorney Weir
said yes. He said it was going to be a
continuation of Walnut Street.
Mr.
Pittenger, already sworn, said prior to the subdivision the parcel included
this piece. It was not a separate
piece. He said they purchased two lots,
Block 118, Lots 24 and 51. He said they
July
1, 2002 Page
3
were
already merged. He said they were going
to create a cul de sac. He said it was
just excess land when they were done with the subdivision. He said it was half the required size at the
time. He said they eliminated the dead
end. He said Mr. Weir purchased the
back piece of the mother lot.
Attorney
Weir asked Mr. Weir to explain to the Board about the plans. Mr. Weir explained they are moving the house
an additional 10 back. Captain Morris
said the front setback has increased would the length of the driveway also be
increased. Mr. Weir said the driveway
will also be increased by 10. Captain
Morris asked if this would be a single width driveway. Mr. Weir said he did not come into this with
any specific home in mind.
Captain
Morris said his concern is cars parking on the curve. Mr. Weir said once the trees are removed there will be a lot more
visibility. Mr. Giardina stated he felt
the driveway was on the wrong side. He
stated the driveway should be furthest from the curve.
Chairman
Braun asked Mr. Gerken if he had any concerns.
Mr. Gerken said the speed limit on Juliette Drive is 25 mph. Mr. Gerken stated the driveway should be
built as far from the curve as possible.
Mr.
Giardina asked if Mr. Weir ever had a problem with people coming through his
lot. Mr. Weir said yes, sometimes
children walk or ride their bikes through his property. He said the wooded portion of the lot is so
far from the house he has no way of monitoring the activity in that area. Committeeman Devlin said he thinks that
problem will exist regardless of how the property is divided.
Mr.
Maczuga suggested a T driveway, which would allow cars to turn around before
leaving the driveway. Mr. Weir agreed.
Mayor
Thomson said he would like to see some sort of footprint so the Board can judge
the impact on the neighborhood. He said
the overall should not be more than 2200 s.f.
Mr. Weir said the one thing he did not want to be held to is the foot
print of 32 X 34.
Mayor
Thomson said the Board would need to see what the foot print would be. This is an undersized lot. Chairman Braun suggested the Board set
parameters, a 35 front setback; a maximum width of 35; and a maximum s.f. of
1,100 s.f. on the first floor. He said
the house could be as long as he wishes as long as the area of the first floor
does not exceed 1,100 s.f. including the garage. The garage would be located on the northeast side of the house.
Mr.
Robert Yuro, already sworn, went over drainage issues. He said Mr. Gerken recommended a dry well be
provided. He said a 500 gallon dry well
for a 25 year storm would be a very large structure. He said about 78% of the homes drain onto the existing grade. He said all of the roof leaders will drain
to the front lawn and then onto Juliette Drive. Mr. Gerken said the run off would increase going from a wooded
area to a cleared area. He still
suggested the dry well.
Mr.
Yuro said a 2% swale will go along the north property line and out to the
street. He said there is a low spot on
the south side but it is a small isolated area. Attorney Rubino said if the
July
1, 2002 Page
4
application
is approved the applicant will have to submit a grading and drainage plan to
Mr.
Gerken
for his approval.
The
application was open to the public.
Mike
Durik said his house is across the street from the Weirs property. His concern is cars backing out of the
driveway. Chairman Braun said there
will be a T driveway so they wont have to back out.
Heather
Stout, Forrest Street, was sworn. She
said the speed limit is 25 mph and nobody goes that. She said the lot should be left alone.
Susan
Butz presented the Board with some photos of the wooded portion of the Weir
property. She showed that the lot is
not dangerous and it is not an eyesore.
Entered
into evidence:
OB-1 Photo taken from Butz property
OB-2 Photo of front of property
OB-3 Photo of children in woods
OB-4 Photo taken from curb of property
Mrs.
Butz said she will be looking at another driveway from hers. She said the lot is not dangerous or an
eyesore. She said when her and her
husband purchased the property they did because the zoning prohibited the
subdivision of the Weir lot. She said
the Board is considering an application which would increase the density of the
property. She said this would damage
her property value. Chairman Braun
asked how she would feel if they cleared the land and put up a fence. Mrs. Butz said she would prefer that to a
driveway 10 from hers.
Richard
Butz said this is against the master plan.
He said this application does not benefit the township or the
neighbors.
Mr.
Weir said showing photos of children on his property does not diminish the
liability.
Attorney
Weir said this is an improvement to the neighborhood. He said it would be better for the township to have a house on
the property instead of a wooded lot. He
said 32% of the lots in that area are non-conforming. He said the applicant has tried to both purchase additional
property and sell his property. He said
if a house is built you can take control of the property otherwise you may have
an eyesore. He said the house will be
setback and small.
Mr.
Tobia asked Mr. Maczuga if the applicant decided to put a garage on the
property would they have to conform with all the setbacks. Mr. Maczuga said yes.
Mr.
Giardina made a motion to approve the application subject to the applicant
complying with the review letters of the Board Professionals. The application is approved subject to the
payment of taxes and applicable assessments, approval from Monmouth County
Planning Board
July
1, 2002 Page
5
and
Monmouth County Board of Health. The
applicant must obtain a tree removal permit.
A
landscaping
and grading plan must be submitted to Mr. Gerken for his approval. The driveway will be located 5 from the
property line on the northeast side. A
T driveway will be installed. A storm
water run-off plan must be submitted to the Engineer for his approval. The proposed dwelling will be 35 from the
right-of-way. The dwelling will be no
more than 35 wide and a total area of 2200 s.f., 1100 s.f. on the first floor
including the garage. There was no
second.
Mr.
Kean moved to deny the application. Ms.
Wilson seconded the motion which was approved by a roll call vote. (Mr. Kean, Mrs. Wilson, Messrs. Rible,
Morris, Tobia and Braun voted yes. Mr. Giardina voted no.) This application was denied.
9:00
P.M. Mr. Giardina left the meeting.
The
Board recessed at 9:00 P.M.
The
meeting resumed at 9:15 P.M.
ANTHONY R. MONTANELLI PB#27-2001 2415 Highway 35, 2423 Highway 35 and 2425 Highway 35,
Block 811.11, Lots 15, 31 and 17. Date
application complete: March 25, 2002.
Applicant seeks to construct building and additional parking on premises
for sale of new and used cars.
Entered
into evidence:
PB-1 Review letter from Glenn Gerken dated May 7,
2002
PB-2 Review letter from John Maczuga dated June
28, 2002
PB-3 Letter from Wall Township Police Department
dated June 30, 2001
PB-4 Letter from Wall Township Fire Prevention
dated June 27, 2001
PB-5 Monmouth County Board of Health letter dated
June 20, 2001
PB-6 Monmouth County Planning Board letter dated
May 14, 2001
PB-7 Freehold Soil Conservation letter dated
February 27, 2002
PB-8 Review letter from Glenn Gerken dated June
27, 2002
PB-9 Review Letter from John Maczuga dated June
26, 2002
PB-10 NJDOT access permit dated June 11, 2002
A-1 Jurisdictional Items
A-2 Map prepared by Kenderian Zilinski dated
January 29, 2001, revised June 14, 2002
A-3 EIS prepared by Kenderian Zilinski dated
June 11, 2002
A-4 Storm water Management report prepared by Kenderian Zilinski
dated February 8, 2001, revised June 18, 2002
A-5 Technical Specifications prepared by
Kenderian Zilinski dated February 12, 2001
A-6 Project Engineers letter dated June 21,
2002
A-7 Drainage easement dated May 9, 2001,
revised May 25, 2001
A-8 Colored rendering
A-9 Phase I plan
July
1, 2002 Page
6
A-10 Phase I plan (reverse side) photos
Attorney
Rubino reviewed the file and stated the Board had jurisdiction to proceed.
Attorney Rubino said that
the Board should hear this matter. The
use is within two miles of new
and used car dealers. There is a proximity issue. The ordinance was changed in May 2001.
Timothy B. Middleton, Esq.
appeared for the applicant.
Attorney Middleton said the
dealership has been in operation for about 45 years. Attorney
Middleton said this
application is for an office building behind Volvo. The property is
approximately
5 acres. Attorney Middleton explained
that there was to be an office complex behind the Volvo. He said residents objected to the proposal. He said a residential lot was created and a
home was built on it. Mr. Montenelli
kept the remainder of the lot. He said
the proposal will be in two phases. The
first will add parking for autos and customers. The second phase will proposes to construct a 10,000 s.f.
addition to the existing building.
Attorney Middleton stated before construction of the addition the
applicant must appear before the Planning Board to obtain final site plan
approval. Mr. Montenelli agrees to
maintain a 75 buffer. He said the
property is in the HB-40 zone. Parking
spaces will be added to store cars. He
said this is the lesser impact on this site.
Attorney
Middleton said the applicant proposes two phases. Phase I is for parking.
Phase II is for the building.
Sworn by Reporter Arnone: Glenn Gerken, Township
Engineer
John
Maczuga, Special Planner
Dan Bush,
Planner and Engineer
Mr. Bush gave his
credentials as a planner and engineer which were accepted by the Board.
Mr.
Bush said he helped design the plan. He
said the auto body shop will be to the north.
They will renovate the existing driveway along Route 35. There will be one way in and one way
out. There will be grass and buffering
along the front. There will be one
detention basin and one recharge basin.
The applicant is proposing to erect a 10,000 s.f. addition in the
back. Mr. Bush explained the buffer
will contain evergreen, Mount Laurel, holly and deciduous trees. Attorney Middleton stated the applicant
proposes to maintain the 75 tree line as a buffer. Mr. Bush said that is correct.
Mr.
Bush explained the grading difference between the subject site and the adjacent
residents. He said this will call for a
retaining wall. Mayor Thomson asked if
the retaining wall will enter the 75 buffer.
Attorney Middleton said they will maintain the 75 buffer.
Mr.
Tobia said the 75 buffer should be delineated with fencing subject to plan
approval. Attorney Middleton said they
can do that.
Captain
Morris asked what would be the highest point of the retaining wall. Mr. Bush said 7. Captain Morris said he is concerned about someone falling off. Mr. Bush said the wall can
July
1, 2002 Page
7
basically
be 5. He said they can put up a fence
around the wall. Attorney Middleton
said along the area where the wall is 5 7 they will put a chain link
fence. It will be black vinyl. Mr. Tobia said it would be a good idea for
security reasons. He said the fence
should go along the entire back. Mr.
Bush said in the last 3 5 years there has only been one case of
vandalism. Attorney Middleton said if
that is what the Board wants we will agree.
Chairman
Braun asked about the level of lighting.
Mr. Bush said the fixtures will be shoebox fixtures which direct the
light downward and away from the neighbors.
They will be 30 tall. Chairman
Braun said he would like the poles as low as possible. Attorney Rubino said the Board is concerned
some of the lighting will bother the neighbors. He suggested a lighting plan be submitted to the engineer. Mr. Gerken suggested 20 poles and Attorney
Middleton agreed. Mr. Bush said if they
use lower fixtures there will have to be more.
Attorney Middleton said they are fine with 20 poles and seven
fixtures. There will only be three
four fixtures on when the dealership is closed.
Captain
Morris asked about the loading zone.
Captain Morris said the car carriers unload on Route 35. Attorney Middleton said they are proposing a
loading zone so the cars will not be unloaded on Route 35.
Attorney
Middleton went over the review letter from Mr. Gerken. Mr. Bush said they will comply with Mr.
Gerkens letter. Mr. Bush testified
that the auto body shop will only be used for the Volvo dealership. He said they are requesting a variance for
front yard setback. He said 50 is
required and 36.4 is proposed.
Mr.
Bush said the applicant needs approval for undersized parking stalls. He said the parking stalls in this proposal
are for storage of cars only. He said
customers will not park there.
Mr.
Bush stated there will be some soil removal.
He said they will keep as much of the existing grade as possible. Mr. Gerken said they must get a soil removal
permit.
Attorney
Middleton said they will comply with the review letter from Mr. Maczuga. Attorney Middleton said one of the neighborss
complained about hearing the pick up of garbage. He said if they move it to the rear it will be louder. Mr. Tobia suggested putting it on the south
side and move it back but keep it on the side.
Attorney Middleton said they have no problem with that.
Mr.
Bush went over the signage. He said
there are currently three building signs on the main building. He said exhibit A-10 shows the signs. He said there are three freestanding signs
and one for the auto body shop.
Mr.
Gerken said there are no drainage problems.
The
application was open to the public.
Christopher
Meikle, 2404 Appleridge Circle, asked if something can be done so the lights
dont shine at the rear of the building.
Mr. Bush said the lights that he is referring to will be removed. Mr. Meikle asked if the lights they are
proposing are less intense. Mr. Bush
said yes. Mr.
July
1, 2002 Page
8
Meikle
asked about the loudspeaker. He said he
can hear it all day long. Chairman
Braun stated the Board needs to make no speakers a condition. Mr. Meikle was also concerned about trash
pick-up. He said they start at 5:00
5:15 A.M. Attorney Middleton said they
will talk to the contractor and tell them not to pick up trash until 7:00
A.M. Captain Morris said there is a
noise ordinance. It is 12:00 A.M.
7:00 A.M.
Ed
Turanski, 2410 Appleridge Circle, was sworn.
Mr. Turanski said the noise is a problem. He said he also doesnt care for the amount of trees that are
going to come down.
John
Tiano, 2402 Appleridge Circle, was sworn.
He stated he has concerns regarding the lighting. He said in the winter there are no leaves on
the trees. He suggested extending a
fence along the rear of the property.
Attorney Middleton agreed.
The
application was closed to the public.
Mr.
Maczuga stated the applicant agreed to plant some street trees in the
front. Attorney Middleton agreed.
Captain
Morris asked about deliveries. Attorney
Middleton said there are three deliveries a week, four at the most. Captain Morris said deliveries should be
during business hours only. Attorney
Middleton agreed.
Mr.
Tobia moved to approve the application for Preliminary and Final Site Plan for
Phase I and Preliminary Site Plan for Phase II subject to the applicant
complying with the review letters of the Board Professionals, payment of taxes
and applicable assessments and review letter from the Wall Township Fire Prevention
Bureau. The applicant will comply with
the requirements of NJDOT, NJDEPE, Monmouth County Board of Health and Freehold
Soil Conservation District. The
applicant must get approval from Monmouth County Planning Board. The applicant must comply with the Wall
Township Affordable Housing Trust Fund and be ADA compliant. The applicant must obtain a tree removal
permit. The applicant shall submit an
application for Subtitle I of Title 39.
The applicant shall install a Knox Box System. The applicant shall schedule a pre-construction meeting with the
Wall Township Police Department for construction traffic. Construction start and stop times shall
conform with Township ordinances. The
buffer area shall not be disturbed during construction. Additional evergreen plantings shall be
installed subject to Board Planner review and approval. The lighting shall be shielded and directed
away from residential area. Additional
landscaping is required throughout parking area subject to Township Planner
approval. Buffer shall be delineated
with snow fencing subject to Board Engineer approval. The applicant will install a black vinyl fence along the rear
line. Lights to be a maximum of 20
high with a maximum of seven and only three on after hours. There shall be no displays on grass
areas. There shall be no loading or
unloading of cars on Highway 35. A
lighting plan shall be submitted for Board Engineer approval. No outside loud speaker and/or
audio
shall be permitted. Basin maintenance
plan shall be submitted to Board Engineer.
Deliveries shall be only during normal business hours. The variance for front yard to allow
existing 36.4 where 50 is required; the variance for signage to allow
existing three signs at 202 s.f. where one sign at 150 is allowed; variance
for parking setback to allow 5 where 10 is required; variance for driveway/accessibility
setback to property lines to allow existing 0 where
July
1, 2002 Page
9
5
is required; variance to allow 8 X 18 parking spot where 19 is required;
variance for lighting to allow in excess of 0.5 candles between property lines;
variance for trash enclosure shall be allowed in front yard where not permitted
are all approved. Waivers are granted as
requested. Mr. Thomson seconded the
motion which was unanimously approved by a roll call vote. (Messrs. Tobia, Thomson, Devlin, Morris,
Kean, Ms. Wilson, Messrs. Rible and Braun voted yes.
RESOLUTION TO BE
MEMORALIZED:
CJS
INVESTMENTS PB#8-2002
Attorney
Rubino read the resolution of approval.
Mr. Tobia moved to adopt the resolution as read. Mr. Morris seconded the motion, which was
unanimously approved by a roll call vote.
(Ms. Wilson, Messrs. Rible, Morris, Devlin, Tobia and Braun voted yes.)
There
being no further business to come before the Board, a motion was made, seconded
and unanimously approved to adjourn the meeting at 10:25 P.M.
Respectfully
submitted,
Betty
Schinestuhl
Recording
Secretary