ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING
SEPTEMBER 17, 2003
The Regular
Meeting of the Wall Township Board of Adjustment was called to order by Chairman
Clayton at 7:45 P.M. Members present
were Chairman Clayton, Vice Chairperson Mary DeSarno, James Gray, Anthony
Rembiszewski, Wilma Morrissey, second alternate Wayne Palmer, Attorney Hirsch,
Planning Coordinator Roberta Lang, Recording Secretary Betty Schinestuhl,
Engineer Gerken, Planner Bergailo and Reporter Arnone.
SALUTE TO THE FLAG
Attorney Hirsch
announced that all requirements under the Open Public Meetings Act had been
complied with for this meeting and read the purposes of the Board of
Adjustment.
Chairman Clayton
stated the Accurate Builders application has been rescheduled for November 5,
2003. They must renotice. The Martelli Development Corporation
application has been rescheduled for November 12, 2003. They must renotice.
CASE #BA26-2003
– Date application
complete: July 2, 2003
APPLICANT: PAMELA BYRNE
PROPERTY: 1218 West Union Lane, Block 701, Lot 1,
R-7.5 zone
RELIEF
REQUESTED: Bulk
Attorney Hirsch reviewed the file and stated the Board had jurisdiction
to proceed.
Timothy B. Middleton, Esq. appeared for the applicant.
Attorney Middleton explained the property is located at the corner of
West Union Lane and Crestview Road. It
is a corner lot. There is an existing
home on the lot. It is a one-story
ranch. The property has two front
yards. The applicant is proposing to
add one story and a wrap-a-round porch.
The porch would front both on West Union Lane and Crestview Road. The porch on Crestview Road would violate
the setback requirements. The
requirement is 30’. The porch would
encroach 10’ into the setback. The
applicant is proposing the wrap-a-round porch for architectural and esthetic
reasons. Most homes in that area
violate the requirements. It would fit
in with the neighborhood. The porch
will be open. It will enhance the esthetics
of the home.
Pamela Byrne was sworn. Ms. Byrne
said she lives at 1218 West Union Lane.
The existing home consists of 900+ s.f.
She would like to double the size to 2,000 s.f. The wrap-a-round porch would enhance the
character of the house.
September 17, 2003 Page 2
Attorney Middleton said the West Union Lane side does not violate the
setback.
Attorney Middleton asked Ms. Byrne what the other homes in the
neighborhood look like. Ms. Byrne said
to the right is a brick two-story, 3,500 s.f. home. Across the street is a large, sprawling home. There are not a lot of homes on West Union
Lane. On Crestview Road there are a
couple two-story homes.
Attorney Middleton asked about the setbacks of the homes on Crestview
Lane. Ms. Byrne said those homes are
closer to the front.
Attorney Hirsch asked how many homes are on Crestview Road. Attorney Middleton said within one-half mile
toward Lakewood Road there are four to five homes. Attorney Middleton asked Ms. Byrne if they comply with the 30’
setback. Ms. Byrne said she doesn’t
think any of them do.
Attorney Middleton asked Ms. Byrne what the stakes are around the
home. Ms. Byrne said they show where
the wrap-a-round porch will come out to.
Attorney Middleton said you are not intending to knock the existing home
down. Ms. Byrne said no.
Attorney Middleton said there is an existing garage and an existing
breezeway that connects the house to the garage. Ms. Byrne agreed.
Attorney Middleton said the proposed wrap-a-round porch will make the
house look nicer to the neighbors. Ms.
Byrne said yes.
Mr. Gray asked if the porch is coming out 10’ on both roads. Ms. Byrne said yes.
Ms. Morrissey asked if the addition will affect the natural lighting on
the neighbor’s house. Ms. Byrne said
no.
Mr. Gray said no trees will need to be removed. Is that correct? Ms.
Byrne said yes.
Chairman Clayton said the width of the porch will be 10’. Ms. Byrne said yes. She said there will be no screens, it will
be open.
Attorney Hirsch said Ms. Byrne testified that the homes on Crestview Road
are closer to the road, is that correct?
Ms. Byrne said yes.
Chairman Clayton said the homes on West Union Lane set back about the
same as yours. Ms. Byrne said yes. Chairman Clayton said from the street it
would be about 30’ back. Attorney
Middleton said that is correct.
Attorney Middleton said he would like to clarify one issue, the closeness
of the homes on Crestview Road. You
said the homes on Crestview appear closer to the road. What are you referring to? Ms. Byrne said she is talking about the
homes on the other side of the street.
September 17, 2003 Page 3
Attorney Middleton said on the north side of Crestview. Ms. Byrne said yes. Attorney Hirsch asked about the homes on the
same side as Ms. Byrne’s. Ms. Byrne
said they would be the same as my house.
Attorney Middleton, referring to the tax map, said Ms. Byrne’s lot is
lot 1. The Board asked about the home
on lot 2, which is to the rear of your home.
Is it the same distance from Crestview?
Ms. Byrne said yes. Attorney
Middleton said the homes on Crestview that are closer to the road are lots 7, 8
and 9. Ms. Byrne said that is
correct. Attorney Middleton said lot 3
is also closer. Ms. Byrne said that is
correct.
The application was open and closed to the public.
Attorney Middleton said the addition will be an enhancement to the
neighborhood. Just a small section of
the porch will violate the setback.
This will be more in keeping with the neighborhood.
Attorney Hirsch asked for the dimensions of the porch along
Crestview. Attorney Middleton said 10’
X 12’ – 13’.
Attorney Hirsch asked for the setback of the house on lot 2. Mr. Gerken said about 40’ – 45’. Attorney Hirsch said there will be 80’ – 90’
between the houses. Attorney Middleton
said that is correct.
Mrs. Morrissey
moved to approve the application as applied.
Mr. Palmer seconded the motion which was approved by a roll call
vote. (Mrs. Morrissey, Messrs. Palmer,
Gray, Rembiszewski, Mrs. DeSarno and Mr. Clayton voted yes.)
Case #31-2003 – Date application complete: September 6,
2003
APPLICANT: SPEEDWAY PROPERTIES, LLC
PROPERTY: 1803 Route 34, Block 922, Lot 3, OR-10
zone
RELIEF REQUESTED: Bulk/Site
Attorney Hirsch
reviewed the file and stated the Board had jurisdiction to proceed.
Mark Aikins,
Esq. appeared for the applicant.
Attorney Hirsch
announced there are only six members present tonight. Attorney Aikins said the applicant has noticed so they will
proceed.
Attorney Aikins
said the applicant is proposing something that has not been seen in New Jersey
in a long time. It is not a new use or
a new site. The site is located at
Hurley Pond Road and Route 34. The
application is asking for use variances, a drive-in is not permitted in this
zone. There is also a variance needed
for the height of the screen. Attorney
Hirsch said the height of the screen may be a use variance. The screen would be the principal
structure.
September 17,
2003 Page 4
Danny Seymour,
Engineer, was sworn. Mr. Seymour gave
his credentials which were accepted by the Board.
Entered into
evidence:
A-1 Rendering
showing the entire property including the race track and parking lot – page two
of the site plan dated September 2, 2003
A-2 Site
plan dated September 2, 2003 prepared by D. Seymour consisting of three sheets
Mr. Seymour said
the main entrance will be off Route 34.
The Route 34 entrance will be an entrance only. The second exit will be on Hurley Pond Road. You will enter from Route 34 and proceed to
the ticket book in front of the refreshment stand. The parking area is gravel and sand now. Lines will be painted on the gravel for
parking spaces. It will be non-toxic
paint. The projector will be in a
trailer to the south of the parking area.
Entered into
evidence:
A-3 Rendering of the site plan
Mr. Seymour,
using A-3, showed where the proposed screen will be. The screen will be 80’ wide and 50’ – 52’ in height.
Attorney Aikins
said it will not exceed 52’. Mr.
Seymour said that is correct.
Attorney Aikins
asked what surrounds the screen.
Attorney Hirsch asked, once this structure is completed will it stay
there or can it be taken down. Mr.
Seymour said it will stay. It is 160’
from the nearest property line. It is
all woods to the north. It is 80’ from
the nearest parking space. The parking
spaces are 10’ X 20’. There is a 30’
aisle. The property slopes down toward
the screen. There will be no parking
behind the projector. There will be a
maximum of 607 parking spaces.
Attorney Aikins
asked how the applicant would control 607 spaces. Mr. Seymour said when the ticket booth gets 100 tickets away from
607 they would close off the entrance.
Attorney Hirsch
asked if the 52’ is the height of the screen.
Mr. Seymour said the screen itself is 34’ high X 80’ wide.
Entered into
evidence:
A-4 Aerial
rendering of the site
Attorney Aikins
asked what the distance is between the screen and the closest structure to the
northeast. Mr. Seymour said 450’. The land slopes down in that area. There is a 12’ – 14’ difference in height
from the parking area to the screen.
Mr. Seymour stated
across from the site there are a new shopping center and a golf course.
September 17,
2003 Page 5
Mr. Seymour,
using A-3, said the building to the west of the refreshment stand is the office
for the Speedway.
Attorney Aikins
said the bathrooms and food stand will be open during the time the drive-in
would be opened. Mr. Seymour said yes.
Attorney Aikins
said the concession stand does not sell alcohol. Mr. Seymour said that is correct. There will be a flyer give out when you come in. It will give directions.
Mr. Seymour,
suing A-3, said the entrance is from Route 34.
You will enter the site and proceed to the ticket booth. There will be no entrance to the drive-in
until your ticket is purchased. Cars
will pull around and employees will direct them where to park. They will exit to Route 34 and Hurley Pond
Road.
Attorney Aikins
said the proposed parking area is not paved.
Mr. Seymour said that is correct.
Attorney Aikins
asked if the run-off will stay on site.
Mr. Seymour said it will drain toward Hurley Pond Road.
Attorney Aikins
asked about handicap drivers. Mr.
Seymour said there is a paved area for handicap parking.
Attorney Hirsch
asked about ADA regulations. Attorney
Aikins said he did not know of any. He
said they will work with the Board Engineer.
Attorney Hirsch said you also need handicap spaces. They would have to meet the size, etc. Mr. Seymour said we can supply 19 handicap
spaces if needed. Attorney Hirsch asked
about bathroom facilities. Mr. Seymour
said the handicap spaces would be closest to the bathrooms.
Mr. Gray asked
Mr. Gerken about ADA requirements. Mr.
Gerken said he doesn’t know if there is any.
Mr. Palmer asked
what the distance is between the screen and the cars. Mr. Seymour said 80’. Mr.
Palmer asked if that was sufficient. Mr.
Seymour said they got that information from people that run drive-ins in other
states. Mr. Gerken said the screen
starts 18’ off the ground.
Mr. Palmer asked
what is the maximum wind the structure and screen can withstand. Mr. Seymour said 85 MPH. Mrs. Morrissey said there was one in upstate
New York that did not withstand that. She
asked if the structure is different than those in the 50’s. Mr. Seymour said yes.
Mrs. Morrissey
asked about the stacking up of cars.
Mr. Seymour said they can handle about 1200’ of cars - doubled.
Mrs. Morrissey
asked how many cars can be stacked. Mr.
Seymour said the speedway has 2,000 people at each event, about 700 cars.
Mrs. Morrissey
asked if you will be able to see the screen from Route 34. Mr. Seymour said no.
September 17,
2003 Page 6
Entered into
evidence:
A-5 Rendering of site line section from
Hurley Pond Road and Route 34
Mr. Seymour,
using A-5, stated there are a number of plants and trees on Hurley Pond Road
and Route 34. The sight line goes right
through the trees. There are 30’ of
trees that will block the view from Hurley Pond Road and Route 34. The screen is about 1,550’ from Route
34. You would not see the screen at
all. It is about 2,600’ from 195.
Mr. Palmer asked
what is the closest location to a resident in the immediate area. Mr. Seymour said the nearest resident is
over 1,000’. Mr. Palmer asked if they
would be able to see the screen. Mr.
Seymour said I don’t think so. They
will see the back of the screen. Mr.
Palmer asked what color is the front of the screen. Mr. Seymour said white.
Mr. Rembiszewski
asked if there were any drive-ins in New Jersey. Mr. Seymour said no.
Attorney Aikins
said if the applicant were to agree to install ½ - 1” rubber caps to show a
line would that be sufficient. Mrs.
DeSarno said yes. Mrs. DeSarno asked if
they would be visible at night. Mr.
Seymour said yes.
Mr. Rembiszewski
asked about the residents on Hurley Pond Road hearing the sound. Mr. Seymour said they are on the other side
of the hill. The sound will be through
the car radio. Attorney Aikins said
there will be no speakers on the screen.
Mr. Palmer asked
for the size of the car spaces. Mr.
Seymour said 10’ X 20’.
Mrs. Morrissey
asked why there was no EIS being done.
Mr. Seymour said because it is being used as parking now and we are not
changing any of the drainage, etc. We
are not opening up any new land.
Attorney Aikins
asked about illumination. Mr. Seymour
said the road, concession stand will be illuminated. Attorney Hirsch asked if a lighting plan was submitted. Attorney Aikins said no.
Mrs. DeSarno
said you will hear sound just from the car radio. Mr. Seymour said yes.
Mr. Gray asked
if a car battery can last three hours.
Mr. Seymour said yes.
Mrs. Morrissey
asked if there would be an impact on cell phones. Mr. Seymour said it is just a radio frequency. He said he does not know of any impact that
would occur.
Mr. Seymour said
he met with Joseph Rizzitello, Fire Prevention. He would like to see “No Parking - Fire Lanes.” Mr. Rizzitello would also like additional
signs along the entire site. The
applicant agrees.
Mr. Gray asked
Mr. Seymour if he designed the parking lot.
Mr. Seymour said he designed the location of the screen.
September 17,
2003 Page 7
Chairman Clayton
asked if after the Saturday night race the lot will be re-graded. Mr. Seymour said parking for the race track
is different because of the entrance.
Mr. Gray said on
a race day 700 cars park there. Mr.
Seymour said yes.
Mr. Palmer asked
about the caps. Attorney Aikins said
they would place the caps at the beginning of the arch and carry it
through. They would stripe in between. After each row fills up they would pick up
the cones.
Attorney Hirsch
if the striping is still there on race day it might cause confusion. Attorney Aikins said there are parking
attendants for race events.
Mr. Palmer asked
if there have been any problems with parking on race day. Attorney Aikins said it has been without
incident. He said he is not aware of
any problems.
Mrs. Morrissey
asked if any township services would be needed, such as, Police Department,
etc. Attorney Aikins said from time to
time the Speedway has employed the Police Department. He said he is not aware of any security problems.
Mr. Gray said he
would like to see some type of permanent parking spaces.
Mrs. DeSarno
said to move the screen. Bring the
traffic around. Mr. Seymour said the
site slopes down. The cars are looking
over the car in front of them. They
cannot move the screen.
Mr. Gerken said
there is going to be an employee at the frontline of each of the rows. Mr. Seymour said yes.
Attorney Hirsch said
there is no way you can guarantee that you are going to have 607 parking
spaces. It will depend on how good the
cars are parked.
Mr. Rembiszewski
asked about parking for larger vehicles, such as, SUV’s. Mr. Seymour said the smaller vehicles will
be parked so they are not behind the SUV’s.
Attorney Hirsch asked how he is going to do that. Mr. Gerken said you are getting into
operation questions.
Mr. Palmer asked
if there would be any type of vehicle that would not be permitted. Mr. Seymour said no. Mobile home types will be parked in the
back.
Attorney Aikins
asked if Mr. Seymour researched this subject.
Mr. Seymour said yes.
9:10 P.M. the
meeting recessed.
9:25 P.M. the
meeting resumed.
Chairman Clayton
asked about the review letter from Schoor DePalma dated September 15,
2003. Mr. Gerken asked about the site
being within the airport hazard zone.
Attorney Aikins said they have made application to the FAA.
September 17,
2003 Page 8
Attorney Aikins,
regarding the parking, said they would install the low profile reflectors that
we see on state highways. They would
delineate the 607 parking spaces with reflectors. Those would be permanent.
On race nights the staff would direct the parking.
Mr. Palmer asked
if 607 running cars would have an impact on the air. Mr. Seymour said we have discussed doing a study regarding
that. Attorney Hirsch asked if they
were going to present something to the Board.
Attorney Aikins said they would if the Board requests it. He said in the winter you may need to turn
the car on for heat. Chairman Clayton
said an EIS is required.
Chairman Clayton
asked if there was anything in the review letter of September 15, 2003 that the
applicant cannot comply with. Mr.
Seymour said on page two under Site Plan Issues, #2, the drive-in will be open
Sunday thru Friday during race season.
After race season it will be seven days a week until the weather is too
bad. He said they should be open from
April thru October.
Mrs. DeSarno
asked if they stay open during rain.
Mr. Seymour said they do show the movie during the rain. Attorney Aikins said it would depend on how
the market responds.
Mr. Gerken asked
about additional lighting. Mr. Seymour
said just exit lights will be used.
Mr. Gerken asked
if they are going to re-grade the parking area. Mr. Seymour said that is done regularly.
Attorney Hirsch,
referring to Item 12 on page 3 of Mr. Gerken’s letter, asked if the applicant
is going to provide the information regarding how the containers will be
supported or anchored or if a wind load design has been performed. Mr. Seymour said that information will be
provided to the Board.
Mr. Gray,
referring to Item 16 on page 3 of Mr. Gerken’s letter, asked if the trailer
will be permanent or something that will be towed in for the evenings when the
Drive-In will be open. Mr. Seymour said
it will be towed in for the week.
The application
was open to the public.
Jim Stigliano,
Sharpe Road, asked what the zone is.
Mr. Seymour said OR-10. Mr.
Stigliano said this is not a permitted use.
Mr. Seymour said that is correct.
Mr. Stigliano asked why this was not before the Planning Board. Mr. Seymour said because it is a zoning
issue with variances.
Mr. Stigliano
asked if the applicant will make any improvements to Route 34. Mr. Seymour said none at this time.
Mr. Stigliano
said if there are 600 cars, that is 6,000’ of cars, does Mr. Seymour think that
entrance on Route 34 can handle that.
Mr. Seymour said it handles more than that now. Mr. Stigliano asked how many days. Mr. Seymour said one day, Saturday. Mr. Stigliano said if approved there will be
600 cars a night. Mr. Seymour said
there is stacking space on site. There
is over 2,400’ of stacking space. Mr.
Stigliano asked if they thought about using Wall Police Department. Mr. Seymour said that was up to the
discretion of the owner.
September 17,
2003 Page 9
Mr. Stigliano
asked if there was septic or sewers on site.
Mr. Seymour said septic. Mr.
Stigliano asked if the system could handle approximately 600 cars with two people
per car, 1200 people. Mr. Seymour said
it is handling 2,000 people on Saturday.
Mr. Stigliano said 1200 people per day might be different.
Mr. Stigliano
asked when the movie would end. Mr.
Seymour said it will end at approximately 11:30 P.M.
Mr. Stigliano
asked if they will be serving liquor.
Mr. Seymour said alcohol is not permitted on site. He said that would be a security issue.
Mr. Stigliano asked
if a traffic expert is coming in to testify.
Attorney Aikins said no. He said
this is less traffic than presently serves the site.
Mr. Stigliano
asked if the jug handle will be able to handle the traffic. Mr. Seymour said it is handling the race car
traffic now which is more than this use.
Chairman Clayton
said a traffic study was brought up in the Police Department letter and Mr.
Gerken’s letter.
Mr. Gray said
race night people park and then go pay there isn’t the stacking. Mr. Seymour said they entrance is two car
wide.
Mrs. Morrissey
asked about the letter from Monmouth County Board of Health regarding the
septic tank. Mr. Seymour said they have
not seen that letter.
Ernest
Bongiovanni, 2008 Plymouth Court, asked if the witness was sworn. Attorney Aikins said yes.
Mr. Bongiovanni
said to Mr. Seymour you said the use is less than what is existing. A once a week operation brings traffic to
the site where they just basically use the parking lot than a year round
operation. Are you saying this is less intense? Attorney Aikins said he will defer this to
the traffic expert.
Mr. Bongiovanni
said page one of the plan states you are seeking a variance for height. Mr. Seymour said it is for 52’.
Mr. Bongiovanni
said part of the existing area is sand.
Mr. Seymour said sand and gravel.
Mr. Bongiovanni said you are making the parking lot gravel. Mr. Seymour said we are doing grading to
level it off. Mr. Bongiovanni asked why
not asphalt. Mr. Seymour said the
ground has been utilized by cars for 50 years.
If we use asphalt it will increase the run-off. Mr. Seymour said anytime you pave you have
to deal with run-off. Mr. Bongiovanni
said that could be a benefit. Swales do
not involve taking down trees. Mr.
Seymour said he has done parking lots before.
A swale would be too small for this site.
Mr. Bongiovanni
said the applicant is asking for a number of waivers. What are some of the other waivers? Mr. Seymour said our planner will give testimony regarding the
waivers. Mr.
September 17,
2003 Page 10
Bongiovanni said
does that mean you have no opinion as to whether or not the waivers are
justified. Mr. Seymour said the planner
will testify. We are not proposing any
new streets, utilities, any drainage facilities, etc. We will be submitting an EIS.
Mr. Bongiovanni said
the existing use was never approved.
This use predates planning.
Mr. Bongiovanni
asked for the percentage of parking on site.
Mr. Seymour said about 40%.
Mr. Bongiovanni
asked if any reports have been done as to what impact the lighting from the
screen will have on the surrounding community.
Mr. Seymour said we have not done any
reports. We do know that stadium lighting is
different. The nearest road is 2600’
away from the screen.
John Kowalsky,
1731, Martin Road, was sworn. Mr.
Kowalsky asked if a marketing survey was done.
Mr. Seymour said the owner will answer that.
Mr. Kowalsky
talked about the noise. He asked if
there was any discussion about having 600 cars with their engines running. Mr. Seymour said we did not do a noise
study. The noise will be less than from
the racetrack.
Phil Perricone,
1741 Azure, was sworn. Mr. Perricone asked
if they are obtaining a FAA waiver. He
asked about the impact the screen will have on incoming aircraft. He said it looks like the screen will be in
the pilots view. Mr. Seymour said they
have applied to the FAA. The FAA has
certain variables. We will be under
their hazard area but they have to approve that.
Robin Cervates,
2009 Tally Ho, was sworn. Ms. Cervates
asked if a site study was done from 195 going west. Mr. Seymour said he did the study going east. Ms. Cervates said she has seen lights over
Wall Speedway. Can someone driving on
195 see the picture? Mr. Seymour said
no.
Ms. Cervates
asked how long it takes the parking lot to empty out. Mr. Seymour said the drive-in will close at 11:30 P.M. It should be empty by midnight.
Mr. Bongiovanni asked
does the Board feel that it’s appropriate that the noise being generated from
the site also include the noise from the race track. Attorney Hirsch said no.
Mr. Bongiovanni
said he thought when one site has one pre-existing, non-conforming use there
can’t be another one. It is one
property. When you are expanding the
use on the property you are expanding the pre-existing, non-conforming
use. Attorney Aikins said the drive-in
theater would be operated only when the raceway was not in use.
Chris Conte,
2083 Overbrook Drive, was sworn. Mr.
Conte said the screen will be built with separate containers. Mr. Seymour said that is correct. The containers are 8’ tall. They will be six high and 12 across. They are welded containers.
Mr. Conte said
standing on Hurley Pond Road at the light can you see the top of the
screen. Mr. Seymour said, using A-4, he
would say no because the trees will block the view.
September 17,
2003 Page 11
Chairman Clayton
said this application will continue on October 15, 2003.
Attorney Aikins
said he is reserving the right to recall Mr. Seymour.
Chairman Clayton
said no further noticing is required.
RESOLUTIONS TO BE MEMORIALIZED:
ERIC OLSEN – BA#27-2003
Block 853, Lot
26 Gray/Morrissey
TERRANCE HEAGLE
– BA#25-2003
Block 142, Lot 6 Morrissey/Rembiszewski
MINUTES TO BE ADOPTED: Mrs. DeSarno moved to approve the
minutes of the Regular Meeting of September 3, 2003. Mr. Gray seconded the motion which was unanimously approved.
Mr. Gray made a
motion for the Board to go into private session. Mrs. Morrissey seconded the motion which was unanimously
approved.
September 17,
2003 Page 1
Private Session
SUNNYSIDE – Attorney Hirsch said we have a draft
agreement which has been signed by Sunnyside and the Township Committee. The proposal could provide better zoning
alternatives. There must be a public
hearing. The applicant will submit a
new application. The professionals will
provide reports. They can have a
TRC. The Board will then schedule a
meeting. He asked if the Board wanted a
special meeting or a regular night.
Within 30 days after the Board’s Professionals reports you are required
to schedule a meeting. If it is not
completed on the first night we must complete the process and make a decision
within 60 days of the first hearing.
They must renotice. It is going
to take five members of the Board to approve.
The resolution executing a settlement agreement of litigation must be
adopted tonight.
SUNNYSIDE MANOR
Block 876, Lots
16 & 44.01 Palmer/Rembiszewski
ATTENDANCE – Chairman Clayton brought up the
attendance of some members. Mr. Gray
asked if there was an attendance policy.
Mr. Palmer said to address the single issue. Mr. Gray suggested taking care of the problem with Mr. Addonizio
and then addressing a new policy.
Attorney Hirsch said you are an independent Board you can make the
decision. Chairman Clayton said he will
talk to Mr. Addonizio before any action is taken.
There being no
further business to come before the Board, a motion was made, seconded, and
unanimously approved to adjourn the meeting at 10:45 P.M.
Respectfully submitted,
Betty Schinestuhl
Recording Secretary