ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEET
AUGUST 7, 2002
The Regular
Meeting of the Wall Township Board of Adjustment was called to order by
Chairman Clayton at 7:30 P.M. Members
present were Chairman Clayton, Mary DeSarno, Anthony Rembiszewski, Dominick
Cinelli, Dennis Noorigian, first alternate Mark Brosnan and second alternate
James Gray, Attorney Hirsch, Planning Coordinator Roberta Lang, Engineer Gerken
and Court Reporter Arnone.
Attorney Hirsch
announced that all requirements under the Open Public Meetings Act had been
complied with for this meeting and read the purposes of the Board of
Adjustment.
Chairman Clayton
announced the Township Committee is here this evening to honor Dennis
Noorigian. He said tonight is his last
meeting. Deputy Mayor Burne read a
Proclamation which was presented to Mr. Noorigian. Mayor Thomson presented Mr. Noorigian with a watch for his many
years of service. Committeeman
Addonizio congratulated Mr. Noorigian and his family for sacrificing their
time. He wished him many happy years in
Florida. Mr. Noorigian stated he
enjoyed being on the Board. He told
about his early days and where they met.
He started in 1982 with Attorney Hirsch. He said the Board was like another family. He thanked everyone.
Chairman Clayton
announced the Stephen Kamuda application will be carried to September 4,
2002. Attorney Hirsch stated there was
a problem with the notice. They must
renotice.
CASE #BA8-2000
– Date application
complete: February 7, 2000. Carried from May 17, 2000, September 20,
2000, January 10, 2001, April 11, 2001, June 20, 2001, September 5, 2001,
October 3, 2001, December 12, 2001, February 20, 2002, April 17, 2002 and June
19, 2002
APPLICANT: TOWER LODGE
PROPERTY: 1506
Gully Road, Block 239, Lot 8, R-30 zone
RELIEF
REQUESTED: Expansion and upgrade of existing nursing
home. Variance required. Site Plan. Use Variance
Sworn by
Reporter Arnone: Thomas
Kelly
Mr. Kelly gave
his qualifications which were accepted by the Board. Mr. Kelly served as the executive director of an assisted living
facility in South Brunswick. He was a
management consultant with Hearthside Senior Management. Mr. Kelly is a certified assisted living
facility administrator in the State of New Jersey. Mr. Kelly stated he has been in this business for 27 – 28
years.
August 7, 2002 Page
2
Attorney
Primavera asked Mr. Kelly if he had reviewed the CON issued by the State. Mr. Kelly said yes. He said it is valid.
Attorney Hirsch
questioned the nature of Mr. Kelly’s testimony. Attorney Primavera said he would like Mr. Kelly to offer expert
opinion as to the CON issued for Tower Lodge.
He would also like him to testify if the expansion could be undertaken
without the additional 60 beds. He said
Mr. Kelly is familiar with the Health Care field.
Attorney
Primavera asked Mr. Kelly to give the Board some of his duties. Mr. Kelly said he has many. He said he insures that the new facilities
go through the proper licensing, hire staff, train staff, etc. He makes sure facilities comply with state
regulations.
Mr. Kelly said
he has served as a consultant in the operation and development of nursing
homes. He has also been a consultant in
the expansion and creation of new facilities.
Attorney Hirsch
said he was still not sure how Mr. Kelly’s testimony would fit in with the
application. Attorney Hirsch allowed
Attorney Primavera to continue.
Mr. Brosnan
asked if he knew the difference in assisted living and long-term care
regulations. He asked Mr. Kelly if he
had any experience in long-term care facilities. Mr. Kelly said yes.
Attorney
Primavera asked Mr. Kelly if he had reviewed the CON. Mr. Kelly said he revied the letter of December 11, 2001. He said the department extended the time
limit for the applicant to add the 60 beds.
The CON is valid until March 24, 2005.
He said if the beds are not added by then the certificate becomes null
and void.
Entered into
evidence:
A-24 Letter from Department of Health dated
December 11, 2001 regarding extension of time
Mr. Kelly said
if the certificate becomes null and void Tower Lodge would have to reapply and
show just cause.
Attorney
Primavera asked if Mr. Kelly if he inspected the facility. Mr. Kelly said yes.
Attorney
Primavera asked if Mr. Kelly reviewed the plans. Mr. Kelly said yes.
Mr. Kelly said
the addition would create a better living environment for Tower Lodge
residents. He said the space now is
very tiny. He said they congregate in
the lobby. He said some activites were
being held in the dining room. He said
the physical therapy room is very tiny.
It does not allow much room for equipment.
Attorney
Primavera asked Mr. Kelly if he spoke with the Administrator and Manager of
Tower Lodge. Mr. Kelly said yes.
Mr. Kelly
explained this extension would not be economically feasible if not for adding
60 beds. He said 60% of the residents
are on Medicaid.
August 7, 2002 Page 3
Attorney
Primavera asked Mr. Kelly to explain the process for obtaining a CON. Mr. Kelly explained the application must be
filed and the commission makes sure the criteria is met before issuing a
CON. He said the applicant must prove
that there is a need for the beds. He
must prove that the project is economically feasible. He also must prove that there is no negative impact on the
existing community.
Mr. Kelly said
these renovations would give the residents the kind of privacy the need. It would bring the facility up to standards.
Mr. Kelly said
the site will maintain is residential appearance. He said the project will comply with buffer requirements. It will not increase traffic.
Richard Edwards,
3214 Sharpe Road, asked Mr. Kelly if he knew the CON was being transferred from
a Neptune facility. Mr. Kelly said yes.
Mr. Edwards
asked if the facility met with regulations or are they grandfathered in. Mr. Kelly said they do not meet current
standards. Mr. Kelly explained that
four beds per room is not longer permitted.
The State does not allow for any four bed rooms. It is not acceptable. It is not adequate. The State allows its operation because it
was built in 1965.
Mr. Edwards
asked if that means the owner is running an over crowded facility. Mr. Kelly said no. Mr. Kelly said the owner is operating the facility to the best of
their ability given the existing conditions.
Mr. Edwards
asked if they want to comply and reduce the over crowding. Mr. Kelly said they are not over
crowded. They have 57 – 60 individuals
at the facility. They are trying to
improve the building.
Mr. Edwards
asked if this facility would be allowed to operate if sold. Mr. Kelly said he is assuming it would
be. He said they would have to meet
certain criteria.
Jim Stigliano,
Sharpe Road, asked if the CON was granted to Tower Lodge. Mr. Kelly said yes.
Mr. Stigliano
asked why would they grant a CON to a building that was not granted permission
to expand. Mr. Kelly said because they
meet the criteria. He said the granting
of the CON to Tower Lodge is stating there is a need in the community.
Mr. Stigliano
asked if the State came out and looked at the building. Mr. Kelly said they review all the
information.
Mr. Stigliano
said there are two nursing homes in the area that have been closed down. Mr. Kelly said that is correct.
Mr. Stigliano
asked if the applicant went to look at those two vacant sites. Has he looked at other sites. Mr. Kelly said they are looking for the need
for the building. They have to turn
people away. He said why would the
applicant want to purchase land and build a new building
August 7, 2002 Page
4
when they can
meet the need right on site. Mr. Kelly
also stated they have been operating at the current location since 1965.
Mr. Stigliano
stated this owner has owned the facility for the past 7 years. He said it was a business decision to
operate it and has been since 1965. He
asked if it has been run economically since 1965. Mr. Kelly stated he has not seen the accounting books. He said he cannot respond to that.
Mr. Stigliano
asked if this addition could be scaled down and still maintain good living
conditions for the residents. Mr. Kelly
said he did not think so.
Mr. Stigliano
asked how many residents end up going back home. Mr. Kelly said he cannot answer that.
Mr. Stigliano
stated this is a long term care facility.
Mr. Kelly said Tower Lodge is licensed as a skilled nursing
facility.
Mr. Stigliano
stated the residents there will probably never go home. Mr. Kelly said he does not know what
percentage will go home. He said it is
normal for skilled nursing homes to provide rehabilitation.
Joe Lesniewski,
Ruta Boulevard, asked about the three criteria that the Board of Health uses to
issue the CON. He asked Mr. Kelly what
does he mean by negative impact to other services. He asked what impact do they look at. Mr. Kelly read from the CON application and review process. He said they look for how many people have
to be turned away, the facility structure.
He said the Board of Health does not want to see our seniors living four
in a room. The State will no grant a
CON if the facility plans on four in a room.
This application meets all criteria.
Mr. Lesniewski
said they look at the impacts to other facilities but not to the residents. Mr. Kelly said it was never meant to
maintain jurisdiction over municipalities.
Mr. Lesniewski
asked what type of insurance generates more revenue, a rehabilitation of 90 –
100 days or a long term care patient.
Mr. Kelly said there is more gross revenue on a patient that stays a
longer period of time.
Mr. Lesniewski
asked if there would be any out patient rehabilitation. Mr. Kelly said no. Attorney Primavera said there will be no out patient services. Attorney Hirsch asked if the facility can provide
out patient care. Mr. Kelly said no
because they are not licensed for that.
Attorney Hirsch
said the state has issued a moratorium on issuing CON to nursing homes. Mr. Kelly said yes.
Attorney Hirsch
said this CON was issued to another facility.
Attorney Hirsch said this facility could not get a new CON because there
is a moratorium. Mr. Kelly said that is
correct.
Attorney Hirsch
said beds are being transferred, that is the only way you can get beds. Mr. Kelly said that is correct.
August 7, 2002 Page
5
Attorney Hirsch
asked if it was accurate to say that this facility has been issued a CON. Mr. Kelly said yes.
Attorney Hirsch
said the only way to get a CON approval is to transfer. Mr. Kelly said that is correct.
Attorney Hirsch
said the need may not be in Wall Township but the need for beds may be in the
region. Mr. Kelly said he thinks the
need is for Wall Township.
Mrs. DeSarno
asked if this facility has been turning away Wall residents. Mr. Kelly said he understands that Wall
residents as well as residents of surrounding communities have been turned
away.
Attorney
Primavera said a previous witness testified that between June 20 and August 23,
2001, ten people were turned away. He
said he did not know how many were Wall residents. Mrs. DeSarno asked him to get that information.
Attorney Hirsch
said his notes say 66% of the residents came from Monmouth County, 10% from
Ocean County and the balance from other areas.
He said 15 had family in Wall.
Richard Edwards,
3214 Sharpe Road said at the October 3rd meeting it was testified
that six residents were from Wall.
Mr. Gray asked
if there was a reason 60 beds were being added. He asked what is magical about 60 beds. Mr. Kelly said there is nothing magical about 60 beds. It seems to be the model number adopted by
the state as something that makes sense.
Chairman Clayton
asked if zoning came into play regarding criteria. Mr. Kelly said he is sorry to say there is not a lot of
consideration on zoning. He said they
look at the overall application.
Chairman Clayton
asked what negative impact they look at regarding the neighborhood. Mr. Kelly said they look at if it is going
to have a negative impact on other facilities in the area. He said they also look to see if it would
create an undue situation as far as staffing is concerned.
Mr. Edwards
asked if they can transfer 30 beds from Wall Township to Neptune. Mr. Kelly said he does not know. He said they look at the entire scope of the
application.
Mr. Edwards asked
if patients were at another facility would they be transferred to Wall. Mr. Kelly said he did not think they would
transfer a patient that did not want it.
Mr. Stigliano
asked if the commissioner that approved this CON was still commissioner. Mr. Kelly said there is a new
commissioner. Mr. Kelly said Mr. F.
Costas wrote the letter and he is still there.
He said the commissioners change regularly.
Mr. Brosnan
asked if a application for a CON be submitted without a location. Mr. Kelly said he believes if it applies to
assisted living, yes.
August 7, 2002 Page
6
Mr. Brosnan
asked if you have to qualify location of the facility for skilled nursing. Mr. Kelly said he believes so.
Mr. Brosnan
asked how often does the Commissioner review the CON applications. Mr. Kelly said there are certain
cycles. He said the applications are
submitted the first of every month. He
said the review cycle is usually 60 – 90 days.
Mr. Gray asked
if he owned four different facilities in Monmouth County and applied for a CON
would he have to tell them which facility.
Mr. Kelly said absolutely. He
said you have to be specific where the CON will be used.
Bob Seelandt,
1502 Gully Road, asked if most facilities like this built in residential areas. Mr. Kelly said quite often yes. Mr. Kelly said there are hundreds of
facilities. He said he has been to 40 –
50 throughout the state and most are in residential communities.
Mr. Seelandt
asked if the commissioner looks at the impact on the area. Mr. Kelly said he does not know how specific
they are. He said they have their own
set of criteria.
Mr. Rembiszewski
asked if the commissioner sends out staff to the area. Mr. Kelly said he has no idea if they come
into a community. He said all applications
are on file. They are public
information. He said as a resident you
can give your opinion toe the commissioner’s office.
Joseph
Lesniewski, 2107 Ruta Boulevard, asked what kind of staffing increase would
there be. He said this facility will
have 120 beds. He asked how many people
will be on staff. Mr. Kelly said not a
large number. It would depend on
meeting the state criteria, Medicare regulations, etc.
Mr. Lesniewski
asked if Mr. Kelly visited a facility with 120 beds. Mr. Kelly said yes. They
had, maybe, 45 people. It is a mixture
of full-time and part-time.
Peter Avakian,
still under oath, explained the rendering on the board was a merged drawing of
two conceptual plans. He said the
original site plan conformed with all the requirements of the township.
Entered into
evidence:
A-25 Colored rendering of concept plan dated
February 20, 2002
Mr. Avakian said
there is nothing on this plan that is not on A-20.
Mr. Avakian said
an attempt was made to comply with the 75’ buffer setback. He said the rear of the property will remain
in its natural state. He said the
detention facility has been moved underground.
He said the building will be located 125’ from the rear property
line. He said 75’ will be a buffer of
mature trees.
Mr. Avakian said
in the east area the proposal is to limit the clearing and there will be a 75’
buffer. The applicant is proposing
additional plantings in this area.
August 7, 2002 Page
7
Mr. Brosnan
asked what will be done to preserve the root system of those trees. Mr. Avakian said that is incorporated on the
plan. He said there will be protective
fencing and the trees will be identified.
Attorney
Primavera asked Mr. Avakian to go over the building and impervious coverage.
Mr. Avakian said
the building coverage will be 20.8% where 14% is permitted. Proposed impervious coverage is 42% where
25% is permitted.
Attorney
Primavera explained the excessive impervious coverage is due to the circular
driveway. Mr. Avakian agreed.
Attorney Primavera
asked Mr. Avakian if there have been any changes to the parking area. Mr. Avakian said there is one change. Six parking spaces on the north corner have
been moved to the rear of the building.
Mr. Avakian said 74 spaces are being proposed where 72 are
required.
Mr. Avakian then
went over the landscape plan. Mr.
Avakian said the applicant has proposed 45 additional plantings along the south
and north area. He said 23 on the south
side and 22 on the north side. They
will be white pines and lower shrubs.
Mr. Avakian said along the rear property line 10 new trees will be
planted and 24 new plantings near the parking area. He said a lot of the trees will remain. Mr. Avakian said the proposed parking along the north property
line encroaches the 75’ by 20’. He said
the applicant will over plant with dogwoods, holly and some lower forsethia and
averdities. He said there will be a
total of 250 new trees and shrubs. Mr.
Avakian said there will be four separate landscaped aisles.
Attorney
Primavera said the Board asked if the applicant would be willing to put in a
fence or plant outside plantings to buffer the side. Mr. Avakian said the applicant said that would be no problem.
Attorney
Primavera asked what variances are required.
Mr. Avakian said there are five bulk variances being sought. They include building coverage, impervious
coverage, buffer width, use of the buffer and area length.
Attorney
Primavera asked if the loading area was sufficient to handle the trucks. Attorney Primavera said the applicant has
agreed to have no deliveries by tractor trailer. Mr. Avakian said that is correct.
Attorney
Primavera asked if Mr. Avakian reviewed all the professional reports. Mr. Avakian said yes.
Attorney
Primavera asked Mr. Avakian if the applicant has addressed each of Mr. Gerken’s
concerns. Mr. Avakian said we have
addressed them. He said the necessary
items will be shown on the site plan for Mr. Gerken’s approval. He said the final details of the drainage
and grading plan will go on the final revised plans.
August 7, 2002 Page
8
Attorney
Primavera asked Mr. Avakian to go over the lighting. Mr. Avakian said the Board of Health has minimum candle
requirements. The lights at the egress
have to be lit ˝ hour before sunset until ˝ hour after sunrise. Mr. Avakian said the lighting is shown on
the architectural plans. He said they
all comply with Township regulations.
He said the lightings are back from the property line so no spillage
goes onto the residential properties.
Attorney
Primavera asked, if this application is approved, would you be able to supply
Mr. Gerken’s office with a complete set of revised plans conforming with
Township ordinances. Mr. Avakian said
yes, there is nothing in the reports that we would have any problem complying
with. He said they will comply with the
engineer and planner on the final site plan.
Attorney
Primavera asked if the variances could be granted by this Board without
substantial negative impact to the residents.
Mr. Avakian said yes.
Mr. Cinelli
asked Mr. Gerken and Mr. Maczuga if a formal landscape plan has been
submitted. Mr. Maczuga said yes,
Mr. Maczuga said
there is going to have to be some clearing done for connection to the existing
storm sewer. He said it is not on the
plan. Mr. Avakian said it is shown in
the construction detail.
Mr. Maczuga
asked how much clearing will be done.
Mr. Avakian said it is a small pieces.
He said between 3’ – 5’. It is
shallow. It will not be more than 10’
in width.
Mr. Maczuga said
he had some concerns regarding the landscaping. He said when you clear the area there may be some lose of trees
in the forest area. Mr. Avakian said a
combination of protection and supplemental plantings will be done.
Mr. Maczuga said
he did not do a detailed examination of the landscape plan. He said he reserves the right to look at
this again. He said his review was not
done as it was the last plan. He said
he reserves the right to have additional comments. He said there is additional work that needs to be done on the
landscape plan.
Mr. Gerken said
his last report was also based on the concept plan. There have been changes.
He said he has not reviewed the grading plans or revised storm water
management plans. He said he has to
review those items.
Chairman Clayton
asked if he understood correctly that they are not going to plant over the
clearing where the pipe is going to be.
Mr. Avakian said they would not plant directly over the pipe. He said small plants would create a buffer.
Attorney Hirsch
asked Mr. Avakian to go over the property that surrounds the site. Mr. Avakian said on the north, south and
west it is all zoned R-30. On the east
it is zoned R-20.
Mr. Avakian said
the house on the south is 50’ from the property line. He said to the rear of the property the houses front on Ruta
Boulevard. He said there are two homes
directly behind the
August 7, 2002 Page
9
site. He said two additional homes are angled on
Larson Road. He said they are between
60’ – 70’ from the rear property line.
Attorney Hirsch
asked what is the grade relationship between this lot and the lots to the
rear. Mr. Avakian said in the northeast
corner the elevation is 90’. On Gully
Road, along the same property line, it is about 100’. He said there is about 10’ difference. He said there is a difference of 10’ between the north and south
side. He said everything drains in a
southeast direction.
Attorney Hirsch
asked if the residents homes behind this site higher or lower than Tower
Lodge. Mr. Avakian said they are
lower. He said the houses are slightly
higher than the elevation.
Attorney Hirsch
asked what kind of view would they have of the facility. Mr. Avakian said he cannot answer that.
Attorney Hirsch
asked what about on the north side. Mr.
Avakian said on the north side there are three lots,. He said there are five lots between the rear yard and Gully
Road. He said both houses front on
Brighton. He said they are outside the
limit of 200’ area. Lot 2 is about 175’
and lot 3 is over 250’ from the site’s property line. He said two other houses are 250’ from the property line and one
house is 25’ – 30’ from the property line.
Attorney Hirsch
asked what was across the street. Mr.
Avakian said there are three lots. He
said one of the frontages is contiguous with this property. He said the other two are setback 40’ from
the property line. The third home is
about 100’ from the property line.
Mr. Gerken said
his understanding is the applicant is not going to submit new revised site plans
until approval. Is that right? Mr. Avakian said that is correct.
Chairman Clayton
asked Mr. Gerken and Mr. Maczuga if they preferred the fence or plantings along
the property line. Attorney Hirsch said
a property owner suggested that. The Board
cannot take a poll of who wants trees in the neighborhood. Chairman Clayton said maybe the Board should
just go with the fence. Attorney
Primavera said he asked the neighbors at the last meeting to contact the
applicant regarding landscaping or a fence.
He said no one has contacted him.
Richard Edwards,
3214 Sharpe Road, asked Mr. Avakian if the rate of flow has changed. Mr. Avakian said it has not changed. He said a 100 year storm should handle
it. He said they are decreasing the run
off by about 35%.
Mr. Edwards
asked if they did a calculation for an existing storm drainage system. Mr. Avakian said they did all calculations
on site. He said the run off is being
decreased.
Mr. Edwards
asked where does the reduction of water go.
Mr. Avakian said in the underground system.
Mr. Edwards
asked how many candle powered lights are on the area. Mr. Avakian said three proposed lights on the east side, four on
the north, one double on the west side and 10 fixtures at the entrance.
August 7, 2002 Page
10
Mr. Edwards
asked what is the size of those lights and what type. Mr. Avakian said they have not changed from the original
plan. They are 14’ high and 200 watt.
Laurie
DeKanyleal, 2305 Ruta Boulevard, said her property line is only 12’ from the
proposed property line.
Joseph
Lesniewski, 2307 Ruta Boulevard, asked to have the drainage system
explained. Mr. Avakian said it is a
total number, 4 cubic feet per second.
Mr. Lesniewski
said it would become full in 1 hour 15 minutes. Mr. Avakian said no and explained how the system worked.
Mr. Lesniewski
asked how many hours would that system take to become full. Mr. Avakian said he would have to review the
drainage calculations.
Mr. Lesniewski
said 25% impervious coverage is allowed.
Mr. Avakian said that is correct.
Mr. Lesniewski said you are asking for 42%. Mr. Avakian said yes. Mr.
Lesniewski asked then why do we have a 25% requirement. Mr. Avakian said when you deviate from that
requirement you have to come to the Board for a variance.
Mr. Lesniewski
asked Mr. Avakian if he thought 42% was extreme. Mr. Avakian said no. He
said that is what has to happen unless you go two stories, which the applicant
did not want to do. He said they have
done everything they can to comply with the ordinances.
Mr. Lesniewski
asked what guarantee does he have that there will be no drainage problems. Mr. Avakian said the underground drainage is
very efficient.
Mr. Lesniewski
asked about the loading dock. Mr.
Avakian said the loading dock is slightly less in width. Mr. Lesniewski asked if the vehicles would
go head in. Mr. Avakian said it depends
on what they were unloading. He said
they can drive into the driveway aisle and back in. He said if they had to unload from the rear they would back into
the dock.
Jim Stigliano,
Sharpe Road, asked Mr. Avakian if he knew there might be an underground stream
on that property. Mr. Avakian said they
did soil borings on site and they did not show anything. He said there was no stream activity shown. He said they studied only their site.
Mr. Stigliano
said there are at least four families, in the rear of that property, that have
water in their basement. He said there
is an old stream in that area. Mr.
Avakian said there is a difference in elevation of between 10’ – 12’. He said if there was high water it would go
into the ditch. Mr. Stigliano said you
still have volume and the water will come down to our properties and go into
our basements.
Bob Seeland,
1502 Gully Road, asked how will the additional water effect his well. Mr. Avakian said an EIS study was prepared
and submitted. He said he does not know
the answer to his question. Mr. Seeland
said you are putting run off water back into the ground, correct. Mr. Avakian said we are not putting it back
into the ground. Mr. Seeland said you
are taking water
August 7, 2002 Page
11
from a parking
lot and that is going to go into the ground and that is going to effect our
wells. Mr. Avakian said it is not going
to go back into the ground. He said the
system allows for cleaning particular matter.
He said that matter will not be discharged into the ground.
Joe Schengrund,
3217 Brighton Avenue, said he lives on the northeast corner of the
property. He said his problem is his
bedroom is 300’ from the garbage dumpster.
He said garbage was picked up at 5:55 A.M. this morning. He is concerned about noise. He said refrigerator trucks just sit there
and they idle. He said he would like to
see some noise management. Attorney
Primavera said they will eliminate that noise.
He said he will call Marcal again and tell them to put Tower Lodge
further down on the route. Mr.
Schengrund said something has to be done.
Mr. Brosnan
asked if there was any portion of the black top area that is only used for fire
and emergency equipment. Mr. Avakian
said no, we have designed the emergency access with GO grid blocks.
Mr. Primavera
said he has two additional witnesses.
Mr. Primavera
said they can revise the site plan and get them to Mr. Gerken. Mr. Gerken said it is always nice to have
the final site plan. He said they do
not have the final grading or drainage plans either.
Mr. Cinelli said
the applicant should also submit a landscape architectural plan to the Board
engineer.
Attorney Primavera
asked the public to come to Tower Lodge and tell them what they would like
done.
Attorney Hirsch
said at the time of construction the Board engineer’s office and landscape
architect go out to the site. They do
on site review and see where gaps may be.
Mr. Brosnan
asked for transcripts of every meeting.
Chairman Clayton
announced this application will be carried to October 16, 2002.
Mr. Primavera
waived the time limits.
Attorney Hirsch
said no further noticing is required.
RESOLUTION TO BE MEMORIALIZED
MICHAEL AND
CHRISTINE – BA#18-2002
Block 880, Lot
19 Rembiszewski/Cinelli
There being no
further business to come before the Board, a motion was made, seconded, and
unanimously approved to adjourn the meeting at 10:50 P.M.
Respectfully
submitted,
Betty Schinestuhl
Recording Secretary