ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEET
APRIL 17, 2002
The Regular
Meeting of the Wall Township Board of Adjustment was called to order by
Chairman Clayton at 7:30 P.M. Members
present were Chairman Clayton, Vice Chairman DeSarno, Dennis Noorigian, Ralph
Addonizio, first alternate Mark Brosnan, second alternate Wilma Morrissey,
Attorney Hirsch, Planning Coordinator Pam D’Andrea, Recording Secretary Betty
Schinestuhl, Engineer Glenn Gerken, Planner John Maczuga and Court Reporter
Arnone.
Attorney Hirsch
announced that all requirements under the Open Public Meetings Act had been
complied with for this meeting and read the purposes of the Board of
Adjustment.
Chairman Clayton
said there are three applications for this evening. The first one will be Maureen C. French.
CASE #BA2-2002
– Date application
complete: February 25, 2002
APPLICANT: MAUREEN
C. FRENCH
PROPERTY: 3420
Belmar Boulevard, Block 751, Lot 50, R-30 Zone
RELIEF
REQUESTED: Bulk variance
Attorney Hirsch
reviewed the file and stated the Board had jurisdiction to proceed.
Timothy B.
Middleton appeared for the applicant.
Attorney
Middleton explained the applicant is seeking permission to build a detached garage. The garage will be 1,380 s.f., 17.5’ in
height. The ordinance permits 1,000
s.f. and 16’ in height. He explained
the owner has five cars and does a lot of work on those vehicles. He does a lot of work outside and would like
to bring them inside. He would also
like to use the garage for storage. It
will not be a negative impact on the neighborhood.
Robert French
was sworn.
Mr. French
stated he has lived at this residence for over 30 years. He is a life-long resident of Wall
Township. He is seeking to build a
detached garage. He stated he has four
cars and a pick-up. He does all the
maintenance on them. He would like to
keep them inside. He would also like to
store his pool equipment in the garage.
He said everything is stored outside now. He said bringing everything inside would enhance the
neighborhood. He said he is proposing a
nice building.
Entered into
evidence:
April 17, 2002 Page
2
A-1 Photo of property
A-2 Photo of property
A-3 Photo of property
A-4 Photo of property
A-5 Photo of property
A-6 Elevation of garage
Mr. French
described the photos. He said A-5 shows
the house, circular driveway and the area where the garage will go. A-4 is a photo from the east. It shows the tree buffer.
Attorney
Middleton asked how far is the garage from the property line. Mr. French said 30’ from the property
line. He said it is approximately 100’
from his neighbor’s house.
Mr. French said
the A-3 photo was taken from the front of the property on Belmar Boulevard
looking back to the north. A-2 is a
picture of the neighbor’s house showing the buffer. A-1 is the same, it shows the buffer.
Mr. French said
the siding on the garage will be similar to what is on his house.
Attorney
Middleton asked Mr. French why 17.5’ in height. Mr. French said he would like to make the roof the same pitch as
the house. He would like to use it for
storage. It will have heat so he can
work in the garage during the cold weather.
Attorney Hirsch
asked how big lot 62 is. Mr. French
said he did not know. He said his
property is 1½ acres. He said that one
must be about 1 acre.
Attorney
Middleton said there is no roadway between the properties. He had a title company research it and there
is no roadway.
Attorney Hirsch
asked about the setback of the house on lot 62. Mr. French explained that house is on an angle. He said the closest to the proposed garage
is about 100’. He said the back of that
house is about where his pool is now.
He said that house faces Waterview Way.
Mrs. Morrissey
asked if the driveway will be paved.
Mr. French said yes.
Mrs. Morrissey
asked if the garage will be visible to the neighbors. Mr. French said in the fall, yes.
Mr. Gerken said
the only comment he had was they must submit a survey and they can submit that
when they go for their building permit.
Chairman Clayton
asked how far is the garage from your house.
Mr. French said about 20’. Mr.
Gerken said it scales about 30’.
The application
was open and closed to the public.
Mrs. DeSarno said
she knows the property. She said it is
very well maintained.
April 17, 2002 Page
3
Mrs. DeSarno moved
to approve the application as applied for.
Mrs. Morrissey seconded the motion which was approved by a roll call
vote. (Mesdames DeSarno and Morrissey,
Messrs. Brosnan, Addonizio, Noorigian and Clayton voted yes.)
7:50 P.M. Mr.
Rembiszewski arrived.
CARRIED APPLICATIONS
CASE #BA-31-2001 – Date application complete: December 31,
2001
APPLICANT: SAMANTHA JACE
PROPERTY: 5213 Routes 33 & 34, Block 911, Lot
19, HB-40 Zone
RELIEF REQUESTED: Use variance
Attorney Hirsch
previously accepted jurisdiction.
Jennifer Krimko,
Esq. appeared for the applicant.
Attorney Krimko
explained the applicant is applying for a use variance. They are proposing a home professional
office. She explained the residence is
not permitted in the zone. She said she
has a professional planner and the owner to testify this evening. Attorney Krimko said they will comply with
paving and lining the parking lot. They
will also make it handicap accessible.
She said they will provide a turn-around.
Shirley Jace was
sworn.
Mrs. Jace said
she lives in the home with her husband and daughter. She explained she is proposing 119 s.f. for home office. It is character analyzation. Mrs. Jace said it is by appointment
only. She does tarot card readings and
palm readings. She said there is only
one customer at a time.
Attorney Krimko
said the maximum number of cars in the parking lot at one time would be two,
one customer and one arriving. Mrs.
Jace said that is correct.
Attorney Krimko
asked about hours of operation. Mrs.
Jace said 9:00 A.M. – 9:00 P.M.
Attorney Krimko
asked about signs. Mrs. Jace said the
lighted signs would be limited to hours of operation.
Attorney Krimko said
they will comply with everything in the Professional’s letters. Mrs. Jace agreed.
Attorney Hirsch
asked how many customers per day. Mrs.
Jace said 2 – 3.
April 17, 2002 Page
4
Attorney Hirsch
asked how long does each session last. Mrs.
Jace said from ½ hour to 45 minutes.
She said she is not that busy right now.
Attorney Hirsch
said she could have more customers depending on how busy, but not at the same
time. Mrs. Jace said she has done this
for five years in Farmingdale. She said
she sometimes has more than three customers in one day but it does not happen
often.
Entered into
evidence:
A-2 Architectural Plans prepared by Passman Echlin
dated July 18, 2001
Mr. Maczuga said
it is conforming to the zone requirements.
Mrs. DeSarno
asked if there are walk-ins. Mrs. Jace
said no, it is by appointment only.
Mrs. DeSarno
asked if the business in Farmingdale was part of her home. Mrs. Jace said no.
Mrs. Morrissey
asked if her business was still in Farmingdale why she wanted to move. Mrs. Jace said she would keep her business
in Farmingdale.
Attorney Krimko
asked if Mrs. Jace would continue doing business in Farmingdale. Mrs. Jace said it would still be her store
location.
Mrs. Morrissey
asked where Mrs. Jace advertised. Mrs.
Jace said in the yellow pages.
Mrs. Morrissey
asked if there was a separate entrance for the business. Mrs. Jace said there are two doorways.
Mr. Rembiszewski
said she was opened 9:00 A.M. – 9:00 P.M.
He asked how many days. Mrs.
Jace said six days a week.
Mr. Rembiszewski
asked what the ages are of the customers that come in. Mrs. Jace said they must be 18 years or
older. If they are younger they must
come with a parent. She said she has
customers ranging from 18 years old to 75 years old.
Mr. Rembiszewski
asked if this was like the ones you see on the boardwalk. Mrs. Jace said yes.
Mr. Brosnan
asked if she considered this a profession.
Mrs. Jace said yes. Mr. Brosnan
asked if a license was required. Mrs.
Jace said no. Mr. Brosnan asked if Mrs.
Jace had a degree. Mrs. Jace said no.
Attorney Krimko
said Mrs. Jace provides a service for a fee so it is a business.
Mr. Maczuga said
this is allowed in this zone.
Attorney Krimko
said if she didn’t live in the house she could use the whole building for this
profession.
April 17, 2002 Page
5
Mr. Brosnan
asked if Mrs. Jace did any research on zoning when she purchased the
property. Mrs. Jace said no.
Mr. Rembiszewski
asked if she would expand if the business grew. Attorney Krimko said there is nowhere to grow. Mr. Rembiszewski asked if they would put an
addition on. Attorney Krimko said no,
unless they came back to the Board.
Mrs. Morrissey
asked if the customers have to go through the house. Mrs. Jace said they come in the front door and there is a little
room to the side.
Mr. Addonizio
asked if this was for entertainment only.
Mrs. Jace said yes. Attorney
Krimko said that is not within the Board’s jurisdiction. Attorney Krimko asked Mrs. Jace if it was
for entertainment only. Mrs. Jace said
no. Mr. Addonizio said it is for
entertainment only. Attorney Krimko
said that is only Mr. Addonizio’s opinion.
Mr. Addonizio
asked Mr. Maczuga if an entertainment based business is allowed. Mr. Maczuga said he would look it up. He said it would come under personal
services miscellaneous.
Mrs. DeSarno said
you come in the front door then go down the hallway, this goes into your
home? Mrs. Jace said it is blocked
off. The only door is to get to the
reading room.
Mrs. DeSarno
asked if they will be able to look into the living room. Mrs. Jace said yes.
Chairman Clayton
asked if the exterior is going to change.
Attorney Krimko said no.
Attorney Krimko
explained this is considered entertainment only when done at a party. She explained customers that come are asking
for advice, spiritual guidance, etc.
Chairman Clayton
asked Mrs. Jace how long she has been doing this. Mrs. Jace said 25 years.
Chairman Clayton
asked if Mrs. Jace employed anyone else.
Mrs. Jace said no.
Chairman Clayton
asked if the outside sign was going to be lit.
Attorney Krimko said it would conform to all ordinances. She said the sign type has not been decided
yet.
Mr. Addonizio
asked what is going to be on the sign.
Mrs. Jace said Spiritualization, Character Analyzation.
Jennifer Krill,
Planner, was sworn. The Board accepted
Ms. Krill’s qualifications.
Entered into
evidence:
A-2 Aerial Photo
A-3 Site Photos (7)
Ms. Krill said
the applicant is requesting 119 s.f. of her home be used as professional
office. She said the applicant is here
because the residence is not permitted.
The site is located in the HB-40
April 17, 2002 Page
6
zone. She explained the aerial photos are the
property on Routes 33 & 34. Ms.
Krill explained what was located in the neighborhood. Ms. Krill explained the applicant is going to provide a service
to the residents of Wall Township. She
is using 119 s.f. in the existing home on the first story for her
business. There will be no change in
the exterior of the building. She
explained there are individuals that use this service to guide their
lives. She said there is a personal
service being given. She said this
business brings the site more in compliance with the Master Plan. This will have no negative impact on the
surrounding properties. She said the
site will have a paved parking area and handicap accessibility.
Ms. Krill
explained A-3 (site photos) were taken around the site. She explained the surrounding
properties. She said the resident’s
property will be buffered. This will
not create a negative impact. A
circulation pattern will be created and this will be a benefit. They will not back out onto Routes 33 &
34.
Ms. Krill said
the sign will be setback 5’ from the property line. It will be 5’ in height.
It will be externally lit. She
said the sign is being proposed next to commercial property. She said this will not be inconsistent with
the Master Plan. She said it brings it
closer to compliance with the ordinance.
She said all variances are existing.
Ms. Krill said
there are adequate spaces for parking.
Attorney Krimko
said if the home was not part of it then the whole building could be used as
commercial.
Mrs. DeSarno
said the applicant said she has to back out onto Routes 33 & 34. She said she visited the site and she had no
problem making a K-turn.
Mr. Gerken said
the residence is non-conforming and will remain non-conforming. He said he made certain recommendations
regarding parking, signage, lighting, hours of operation and they have provided
that information. He said they would
have to amend the plans for these changes.
Chairman Clayton
said the applicant will be open until 9:00 P.M. He asked if any lighting is proposed. Mr. Gerken said lighting should be provided at the exit and the
parking area. Attorney Krimko said
absolutely.
Chairman Clayton
asked if the landscaping was adequate.
Mr. Maczuga said there may be a landscape plan needed because of the
alterations. Attorney Krimko said they
will come up with a plan for Mr. Maczuga.
Attorney Hirsch
said the light should be shielded and should not go onto other properties.
Mr. Maczuga said
the signage package must be approved.
The application
was open and closed to the public.
Attorney Krimko
said this is permitted in the zone. She
said the residence is what brings the applicant here tonight. She said there is no impact on the
neighborhood or the Master Plan.
April 17, 2002 Page
7
Mrs. DeSarno
moved to deny the application. Mr. Brosnan
seconded the motion which was unanimously approved by a roll call vote. Mrs. DeSarno, Mr. Brosnan, Mrs. Morrissey,
Messrs. Addonizio voted yes, Mrs. Noorigian voted no and Messrs. Clayton and
Rembiszewski voted yes.) Chairman
Clayton said the application has been denied.
Attorney Krimko
said she will submit reconsideration.
8:45 Mr.
Addonizio left the meeting.
8:45 PM the
Board recessed.
9:00 PM the
meeting resumed.
CARRIED APPLICATION
CASE #8-2000 – Date application complete: February 7,
2000. Carried from May 17, 2000,
September 20, 2000, January 10, 2001, April 11, 2001, June 20, 2001, September
5, 2001, October 3, 2001, December 12, 2001, and February 20, 2002.
APPLICANT: TOWER LODGE
PROPERTY: 1506 Gully Road, Block 239, Lot 8, R-30
Zone
RELIEF REQUESTED: Expansion and upgrade of existing
nursing home. Site Plan and Use
Variance
Mr. Hengchuf is
still under oath.
Attorney
Primavera said he has two additional renderings.
Entered into
evidence:
A-21 Rendering of carport
A-22 Photo of nursing home
Mr. Hengchuf
said this building does not look like a strip mall. He said it is a moderate looking building. It has a simple design. The colors are mutant. The colors are pastel and sandstone. He said the photo on the rendering was taken
January 3, 2002 from the northwest corner of the property.
Attorney
Primavera asked if the photo was taken on the neighbor’s property line. Mr. Hengchuf said yes.
Mr. Hengchuf
said A-22 was taken from the rear property line at the northeast corner. He said he was standing in the forest.
April 17, 2002 Page
8
Attorney
Primavera said there is a row of spruce shielding the building. Mr. Hengchuf said when you see the building
it is screened by 7’ high spruces. He
said they will make the building look modest and low to the ground.
Chairman Clayton
asked if the modest look will be carried to the front. Mr. Hengchuf said yes it will match up.
Attorney
Primavera asked Mr. Hengchuf to tell the Board about the odors from the
kitchen. Mr. Hengchuf said odors come
from grease. He said because the
residents are older, the food will be steamed, boiled, blanched, etc. It will not be fried. He said the food is bland. The source of order is not there. He said he worked on a nursing home in Toms
River and never had an incident regarding an odor complaint.
Attorney
Primavera asked if the filtration system planned will be sufficient. Mr. Hengchuf said yes.
Attorney
Primavera asked about the HVAC system on the rooftop. Mr. Hengchuf said he has never had any complaints regarding noise
from an HVAC system on the rooftop. Mr.
Hengchuf said he has placed units within 20’ of a courtyard and has never had
any complaints. He said the HVAC system
will be screened.
Attorney
Primavera asked what type of equipment will be on the roof. Mr. Hengchuf said air handlers, compressor
and furnace. He said the emergency
generator will also be on the roof. It
is made by Kohler.
Attorney
Primavera asked if there would be a noise shield. Mr. Hengchuf said yes a sound screen. It reduces the noise by 20 decimals.
Mr. Brosnan
asked for Mr. Hengchuf to explain the testing process for the generator. Mr. Hengchuf explained the generator is
tested 15 – 30 minutes once a week for about half an hour.
Chairman Clayton
asked what type of fuel is used. Mr.
Hengchuf said natural gas. There will
be no fumes. It is a cleaner fuel.
Mr. Maczuga
asked if they intend to use the sound shield.
Mr. Hengchuf said yes. Mr.
Maczuga said there should be no problem with sound 120’ or more. Mr. Hengchuf said that is correct.
Mr. Brosnan said
this is the first time he has seen a generator on the roof. He asked about inclement weather,
maintenance, etc. Mr. Hengchuf said
they would agree to put the generator in the basement.
Jim Stigliano,
Sharpe Road, asked if the proposed kitchen facility for Tower Lodge is to
include a Kosher kitchen. Mr. Hengchuf
said yes.
Mr. Stigliano
asked Mr. Hengchuf to explain the difference between a regular kitchen and a
Kosher kitchen. Mr. Hengchuf said the
owner would be able to answer that question.
Mr.
April 17, 2002 Page
9
Hengchuf did say
that there is a requirement to separate meat and dairy in a Kosher
kitchen. He said one side would be
dedicated to meat preparation and one to dairy.
Mr. Stigliano
asked if there was a difference in the preparation. Mr. Hengchuf said it is basically the same. It is not spicy.
Rich Edwards,
Sharpe Road, asked if the trash container was going to be changed to one large
container. Mr. Hengchuf said yes. Mr. Edwards asked if there was also going to
be a compactor. Mr. Hengchuf said yes. Mr. Edwards asked about controlling the
liquid from the compactor and the odor.
Mr. Hengchuf said the owner will answer that. He said it is basically a common sense issue. He said in the winter there will be less
pick-up of trash than in the summer. He
said the owner of Tower Lodge is trying to be neighbor friendly.
Mr. Edwards said
that contents in a compactor seem to seep.
He said he is certain that it would smell. He asked how that will be controlled. Attorney Primavera said they would go to the contractor and ask
for their protocol. He said Mr.
Hengchuf is not qualified to answer these questions.
Mr. Edwards
asked how often the compactor will be activated. Mr. Hengchuf said he cannot answer that. Attorney Primavera said as often as the
Board thinks is appropriate. It will be
done during the daytime. He said they
will provide a condition that they would not operate it during a certain time
of the day or on Sunday.
Mr. Edwards said
trash pick-up was 5:00 A.M. Attorney
Primavera said they have asked Marcal to pick up later. He said as soon as he found out about the
5:00 A.M. pick-up he changed it.
Mr. Schengrund,
3217 Brighton Avenue, said nothing has been changed as far as garbage
pick-up. He said they were there at
6:00 A.M. today. He said nothing has
been altered. Attorney Primavera said
it will be.
Mr. Burkhardt,
3215 Brighton Avenue, asked if the emergency generator system was natural gas
or gas turbine. He said that is
important because of the noise. He said
he believes the generator noise distribution report should be available to the
public.
Mr. Brosnan said
there should be a deodorizer for the compactor.
Mr. Burkhardt
asked about the 14, 400 watt lights on the property. Mr. Hengchuf said the engineer will report on that. Mr. Hangchuf said the lighting is much like
the ones outside the municipal building.
Mr. Burkhardt
asked how many hours will the lights be on.
Mr. Hengchuf said the engineer will answer that.
Mr. Burkhardt
asked about lighting over the loading dock.
Mr. Hengchuf said there will be no lighting there.
John Rea was
sworn. The Board accepted Mr. Rea’s
qualifications as a traffic engineer.
April 17, 2002 Page
10
Mr. Rea said he
was retained by Tower Lodge to do a traffic study. He said he has visited the site.
He said he has done a manual and automatic traffic count. He said peak hours for traffic outside Tower
Lodge and peak hours for Tower Lodge are at different times. He said Tower Lodge has a B level
service. He said that is very
good. He said traffic going onto Gully
Road does not have to wait long. He
said they also evaluated parking. He
said there are 20 – 25 vehicles on site.
He said the existing parking is adequate. He said the expanded parking will continue to adequately serve
Tower Lodge. He said the traffic impact
on Gully Road will be minimal. He said
there will be no negative impact.
Attorney Primavera
said the applicant initially eliminated the driveway. He said the Board did not want it eliminated. He asked Mr. Rea for his opinion. Mr. Rea said he feels it would be better to
leave the driveway where it is. He said
the driveway, in his opinion, should stay.
Mr. Maczuga said
he had some concerns about the drop-off area.
Mr. Rea said during the highest peak time there was a little less than
20 drop-offs or pick-ups. He said with
the increase in staff it would increase by 10 – 15.
Chairman Clayton
asked if there would be any parking spaces along the front curbed
driveway. Mr. Rea said the plan does
not show any.
Chairman Clayton
asked if a tractor trailer could turn around.
Mr. Rea said it looks like a single unit truck will be able to turn
around.
Joseph
Lesniewski, asked how Mr. Rea figured the increase in traffic due to additional
staff, etc. Mr. Rea said there are 32
employees in the future there will be 41.
That is an increase of 9, a 25% increase. He said he increased his analysis by higher than that. He said there is no capacity issue
whatsoever.
Mr. Lesniewski
asked about additional visitors. Mr.
Rea said if every resident of the facility, everyday, had visitors the road
would be able to handle that amount of traffic. He said visitors come mostly on weekends when the staff level
drops.
Mr. Lesniewski
asked what the total amount of movement was.
Mr. Rea said during the morning, 6:30 – 7:30 A.M. there was a total of
13 cars entering and 6 exiting. He said
during the afternoon 3:00 – 4:00 P.M. there was a total of 11 cars entering and
17 exiting.
Mr. Lesniewski
asked if this was daily. Mr. Rea said
they deal with peak hours. Mr. Rea said
the increase in staff will not have an impact on Gully Road.
Mr. Edwards asked
if the driveway remained would the six lights that were scheduled to be removed
stay. Mr. Rea said the owner will
answer that. He said the road should be
adequately lit.
Mr. Burkhardt
asked what the difference was between cars and trucks. Mr. Rea said in the A.M., in a span of 2½
hours, 3 trucks exited and four entered.
Mr. Burkhardt
asked if Mr. Rea had any concerns using the long driveway. Mr. Rea said no.
April 17, 2002 Page
11
Mr. Burkhardt
asked Mr. Rea if he had any concerns regarding fire trucks. Mr. Rea said he would leave that up to the
Fire Official. He said fire trucks can get
to the rear of the site.
Mr. Burkhardt
asked about congestion. Mr. Rea said he
did not notice any.
Mr. Burkhardt
asked Mr. Rea to go over the figures for peak hours. Mr. Rea said the maximum staff is 31 employees. He said between 6:30 – 7:30 a total of 13
vehicles entered the site. Between 7:30
– 8:30 an additional eight vehicles entered.
There were a total of 21 over a two hour period.
Attorney
Primavera said they would be going from 32 employees at any one time to a
maximum of 41 employees. There is a
total staff of 60.
Robert Gagliano,
appraiser, gave his qualifications which were accepted by the Board.
Attorney
Primavera asked Mr. Gagliano if Tower Lodge hired him. Mr. Gagliano said yes to give the value of
surrounding real estate. Mr. Gagliano
said he tried to identify similar situations.
He said there are 35 nursing homes in Monmouth County. He said he eliminated those on busy streets,
those in commercial areas, those under 100 beds. He said he found seven which he inspected.
Attorney
Primavera asked, if before he prepared his report, did he look at the data of
this application. Mr. Gagliano said
yes.
Attorney Primavera
asked if there was a written report.
Mr. Gagliano said he prepared a report.
He gave a copy to the Board members.
Mr. Gagliano
said he reviewed sales data from January 1, 1999 to present. He eliminated certain sales. He visited the neighborhood to see where the
properties were located. He explained
his report. He said he took all the
sales and put them on a graph. He
explained the graph.
Attorney
Primavera asked Mr. Gagliano to explain the graph using Manalapan as an example. Mr. Gagliano said the values are climbing
over time in the area where the nursing homes are. The values are going up slightly more than the rest of the
town.
Attorney
Primavera asked about the impact on the property owners. Mr. Gagliano said there is no negative impact
for a residential area.
Attorney
Primavera asked if Mr. Gagliano had an opinion as to the sales in this
neighborhood being impaired. Mr.
Gagliano said he does not believe they would be impaired.
Attorney Hirsch
asked what date he included in the analysis of Tower Lodge. Mr. Gagliano said the same time he acted on
the others, between January 1, 1999 and December 2001.
Attorney Hirsch
asked about the trend in Wall Township.
Mr. Gagliano said the value trend is increasing faster than in the rest
of the municipality as a whole.
April 17, 2002 Page
12
Attorney Hirsch
asked, how much. Mr. Gagliano said 19
sales in the neighborhood. Mr. Gagliano
explained the area he used in his analysis was from Belmar Boulevard North to
just pass Brighton Avenue. He said he
included streets as far as Rockfeller.
Mr. Brosnan
asked about the increase within 200’ – 250’.
Mr. Gagliano said there would not be enough data to analyze.
Mr. Maczuga
asked how big the neighborhood is in your analysis. Mr. Gagliano said it is fairly large. Mr. Gagliano said this is a large facility in a residential
area. It does not appear to have an
effect on the sales.
Mr. Brosnan
asked why Mr. Gagliano used sale prices as opposed to assessment values. Mr. Gagliano said assessed values are
extremely different. They are done by
the assessor. Mr. Brosnan said he felt
he would get a better idea from assessed value. Mr. Gagliano explained assessed value.
Attorney
Primavera said Mr. Gagliano’s report does not show a negative impact on the
residents in the area.
Entered into
evidence:
A-23 Mr. Gagliano’s report
Chairman Clayton
said this application will be carried to June 19, 2002. Attorney Primavera waived the time limits.
Mr. Rembiszewski
asked Mr. Primavera to check on the time of garbage pick-up before they come
back. Attorney Primavera said he would
look into it.
There being no
further business to come before the Board, a motion was made, seconded, and
unanimously approved to adjourn the meeting at 10:50 P.M.
Respectfully
submitted,
Betty
Schinestuhl
Recording Secretary