TOWNSHIP OF WALL

ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT

MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEET

HELD IN THE MUNICIPAL MEETING ROOM

MARCH 20, 2002

 

 

The Regular Meeting of the Wall Township Board of Adjustment was called to order by Chairman Clayton at 7:35 P.M.  Members present were Chairman Clayton, Vice Chairman DeSarno, Anthony Rembiszewski, Dominick Cinelli, Dennis Noorigian, second alternate Wilma Morrissey, Attorney Hirsch, Planning Coordinator Pam D’Andrea, Recording Secretary Betty Schinestuhl, Engineer Matt Zahorsky and Reporter Arnone.

 

Attorney Hirsch announced that all requirements under the Open Public Meetings Act had been complied with for this meeting and read the purposes of the Board of Adjustment.

 

Chairman Clayton stated the Christopher Meccia application will be carried to June 5, 2002.  The applicant will have to renotice.

 

NEW APPLICATION

 

CASE #BA2-2002 – Date application complete:  January 16, 2002.

 

APPLICANT:  WILLIAM AND NANCY LYON

 

PROPERTY:  2416 Cypress Street, Block 864, Lot 12, R-10 Zone

 

RELIEF REQUESTED:  Bulk variance

 

William Lyon was sworn.

 

Attorney Hirsch reviewed the file and stated the Board had jurisdiction to proceed.

 

Mr. Lyon said he has lived in this house for 12 years.  He would like to demolish the house and build a new one.  He said it will be moved 5’ to meet the setback.  He does not want to move it back because of the trees. 

 

Entered into evidence:

 

A-1      Rendering of new house

A-2      Right side elevation

A-3      Photo of rear of the house showing the trees

A-4      Photo of rear of the house showing the trees

A-5      Photo of the house

 

Mr. Lyon explained the new house will be a little wider.  It will be moved to meet the side setbacks. 

 

Attorney Hirsch asked what was to the left of the property.  Mr. Lyon said another house.


March 20, 2002                                                                                                           Page 2

 

Attorney Hirsch asked how far is that house setback.  Mr. Lyon said that house is about 21’ back. 

 

Attorney Hirsch asked what was to the right.  Mr. Lyon said that is a vacant lot.  It is a four lot subdivision.  The homes are not under construction yet. 

 

Attorney Hirsch asked if there were any other homes in the neighborhood that were 15’ back.  Mr. Lyon said the house on the corner of Cypress and Marigold. 

 

Attorney Hirsch asked if there were any more homes in the neighborhood within the 15’ setback.  Mr. Lyon said yes.

 

Mrs. Morrissey asked how long Mr. Lyon lived at this address.  Mr. Lyon said 12 years.

 

Mrs. Morrissey asked about the property behind his.  Mr. Lyon said there will be all new homes.  They have not started yet. 

 

Chairman Clayton asked about the rear yard setback.  Mr. Lyon said his yard is about 40’ deep.

 

Attorney Hirsch said this property is in the R-10 zone.  Mr. Zahorsky stated the requirements for rear yard setback are 15’, 10’ for side and 15’ for front.  He said there is no problem from an engineering standpoint.

 

The application was open and closed to the public.

 

Mr. Cinelli moved to approve the application.  Mrs. Morrissey seconded the motion which was unanimously approved by a roll call vote.  (Messrs. Cinelli, Mrs. Morrissey, Messrs. Rembiszewski, Noorigian, Mrs. DeSarno and Mr. Clayton voted yes.)

 

CASE #2A-2002 – Date application complete: January 11, 2002

 

APPLICANT: RICHARD THROCKMORTON AND MAUREEN KELLY

 

PROPERTY: 2835 Allaire Road, Block 805, Lot 5, RR Zone

 

RELIEF REQUESTED: Bulk variance

 

Richard Throckmorton was sworn. 

 

Attorney Hirsch reviewed the file and stated the Board had jurisdiction to proceed.

 

Mr. Throckmorton stated they have lived in the home for seven years.  He stated it is a very small house.  There is a small basement and no attic.  He said they have two children.  They have a pool in the back.  He said they have to back out onto Allaire Road.  They are proposing a two-car garage because they would like to store all their lawn, pool equipment, etc. in the garage.  He said they are also proposing a K-turn so they don’t have to back out onto Allaire Road.  The additional height is for storage.  He said he does not have a rendering of the proposed garage.


March 20, 2002                                                                                                           Page 3

 

Mr. Throckmorton said it will conform to the existing style of the house. 

 

Entered into evidence:

 

A-1      Front elevation

 

Chairman Clayton asked if the garage would have the same siding as the house.  Mr. Throckmorton said it would be a type of asbestos.  He said he will match the paint.  It will be painted the same color.  Mr. Throckmorton said they will use the second story for storage. 

 

Chairman Clayton asked if the garage would have water and electric.  Mr. Throckmorton said it would have just electric.  Mr. Throckmorton said the first floor would be for the cars and the second story for storage. 

 

Chairman Clayton asked how many trees will have to be removed.  Mr. Throckmorton said one small dogwood.  He said there is nothing else there.

 

Mr. Rembiszewski confirmed that Mr. Throckmorton said he had a pool, and it was dangerous going out onto Allaire Road and he wanted the garage for pool and yard furniture storage.  Mr. Throckmorton said everything in his yard he would like to store in the garage. 

 

Mr. Rembiszewski asked if there was a shed on the property.  Mr. Throckmorton said there is an 8 X 8 shed. 

 

Mrs. Morrissey asked how far the garage will be from the pool.  Mr. Throckmorton said about 30’ – 40’. 

 

Mr. Cinelli asked if the shed will stay.  Mr. Throckmorton said yes.

 

Mrs. Morrissey asked if he could lower the height of the garage.  Mr. Throckmorton said they have tried.  He said he has no storage space what-so-ever.  He said his basement is very small.  It is only half the size of the house. 

 

Mr. Zahorsky said this looks like a two-story garage not a 1½ story.  He said it is a two story according to ordinance.  He said there may be a way to lower the height and be 1½ story.

 

Attorney Hirsch asked what the size of the lot is.  Mr. Throckmorton said 100 X 429.  Attorney Hirsch said it is a very long lot.  It has a 74’ front and goes back 428’. 

 

Attorney Hirsch asked what was on lot 6.  Mr. Throckmorton said a house with a garage.  Attorney Hirsch asked if it fronts on Allaire Road.  Mr. Throckmorton said yes.  He said that house is almost on the road.  Mr. Throckmorton said they have a garage but it is on the other side of the property.  He said that garage is a little closer to the road than the one he is proposing.  Attorney Hirsch asked how far that house is from your side property line.  Mr. Throckmorton said about 100’. 


March 20, 2002                                                                                                           Page 4

 

Attorney Hirsch asked what was on lot 4.  Mr. Throckmorton said there is a house with a garage.  He said it is about the same distance from Allaire Road as his.  Attorney Hirsch asked where is

that garage.  Mr. Throckmorton said it is about 20’ from his property.  He said it is setback about 100’ from their house.  Attorney Hirsch asked if it is set back further than Mr. Throckmorton’s would be.  Mr. Throckmorton said theirs would be a little behind his. 

 

Attorney Hirsch asked about the height of the garage.  Mr. Throckmorton said they want to go as high as they can.  The garage is actually a barn. 

 

Attorney Hirsch asked what the s.f. of Mr. Throckmorton’s house is.  Mr. Throckmorton said he did not know. 

 

Mr. Zahorsky said the ½ story can be no more than 2’ on the sides.  It would still give storage space and conform to the ordinance.  He said if it is more than 2’ it would be considered a second story and would need an additional variance.  He said garages are limited to 1½ story. 

 

Mr. Cinelli asked how much s.f. Mr. Throckmorton would have for storage on the ½ story.  Mr. Zahorsky said almost the same as the first story.  He said he would just be limited on the ends.  Mr. Cinelli said he doesn’t loose anything on s.f. from what he’s proposing.  Mr. Zahorsky said  there would be quite a big of storage space.  This way it would not be a second story. 

 

Attorney Hirsch said if the Board was to grant the variance for 20’ and you present the building plans and the height is more than 2’ on the plate the Building Department would not issue you a permit because the plans show a second story.  Attorney Hirsch said you will loose a little storage on the sides.  It will be almost the same amount of s.f.  The Board may consider amending the application. 

 

Mr. Throckmorton said he wants the side walls to be higher.  He said the side would be about 5’.  He said he does not want to stack everything in the middle.  Attorney Hirsch said he would then need a variance for a two story structure. 

 

Mr. Cinelli said the Board would need to grant two variances, one for a two story structure and one for height.  Attorney Hirsch said that is correct.

 

Mr. Cinelli asked who the builder was going to be.  Mr. Throckmorton said Glenn Saker.  Mr. Throckmorton said he was going to draw the plans himself.

 

Chairman Clayton asked Mr. Zahorsky why there is a 1½ story limit.  Mr. Zahorsky said because it then limits it to storage only.  It could not be living space.

 

Mr. Cinelli asked Mr. Throckmorton if he would accept a deed restriction that it would only be used for storage and not living space.  Mr. Throckmorton agreed.

 

The application was open and closed to the public.

 

Mr. Rembiszewski moved to approve the application.  Mr. Cinelli seconded the motion with the added conditions.  He said the Board is granting a variance for height for 20’ and a variance for


March 20, 2002                                                                                                           Page 5

 

a second story and also imposing a deed restriction not to allow any living quarters on the second floor.  The motion was approved by a roll call vote.  (Messrs. Rembiszewski, Cinelli voted yes, Mrs. Morrissey and Mrs. DeSarno voted no, Messrs. Noorigian and Clayton voted yes.)

 

Chairman Clayton stated there are four yeas and two nays.  The application has been approved.

 

CASE #BA-5-2002 – Date application complete: January 25, 2002

 

APPLICANT: JOSEPH AND PATRICIA LAMB

 

PROPERTY: 2167 Village Road, Block 716, Lot 22, R-15 Zone

 

RELIEF REQUESTED: Bulk variance

 

Patricia Lamb was sworn.

 

Attorney Hirsch reviewed the file and stated the Board had jurisdiction to proceed.

 

Mrs. Lamb stated they have lived in the house for 14 years.  It is a small cape.  She said they are proposing to enlarge the kitchen and dining room.  She said she is asking for a 5’ 1” variance for side yard setback.  She said she is in the R-15 zone.  She said her neighbor’s garage is 19’ from the proposed garage.  She said she will conform to the front yard setback.  The height proposed is 18’.  She said it will be used for extra storage.  She said they will install pull down stairs.  She said they will also have access from the second floor.  She said it will all be vinyl sided. 

 

Entered into evidence:

 

A-1      Architectural drawing

A-2      Photo of existing home

A-3      Photo of existing home

A-4      Photo of existing home

A-5      Photo of homes in neighborhood that have been renovated

A-6      Photo of homes in neighborhood that have been renovated

A-7      Photo of homes in neighborhood that have been renovated

A-8      Photo of homes in neighborhood that have been renovated

A-9      Photo of homes in neighborhood that have been renovated

A-10    Photo of homes in neighborhood that have been renovated

A-11    Photo of homes in neighborhood that have been renovated

A-12    Photo of homes in neighborhood that have been renovated

A-13    Photo of homes in neighborhood that have been renovated

A-14    Photo of homes in neighborhood that have been renovated

 

Attorney Hirsch asked if there was an existing garage.  Mrs. Lamb said yes, it is a one car garage.  Attorney Hirsch asked if it was an attached garage.  Mrs. Lamb said yes.

 

Attorney Hirsch asked how far the existing garage from the side setback is.  Mrs. Lamb said 13’.


March 20, 2002                                                                                                           Page 6

 

Mrs. Lamb said the homes in the neighborhood are older homes.  She said most people are putting on additions.  She said she has taken several pictures around the neighborhood.  She said the neighborhood is changing for the better. 

 

Attorney Hirsch asked if Mrs. Lamb’s lot was average for the neighborhood.  Mrs. Lamb said they are all about the same. 

 

Attorney Hirsch asked about the size of the homes.  Mrs. Lamb said the newly renovated homes are larger, others are the same. 

 

Attorney Hirsch asked if the garage on lot 21 would be the same height.  Mrs. Lamb said she is proposing one a little higher.  She said it is a two car garage.

 

Chairman Clayton asked how far the garage would be from the street.  Mrs. Lamb said it would be same as it is currently. 

 

Mrs. DeSarno asked what Mrs. Lamb was going to say regarding the pollution in that area.  Mrs. Lamb said they have the contamination in her area and she is confident it is going to be resolved.

 

Mrs. Morrissey asked if the proposed garage is level to the attached garage next door.  Mrs. Lamb said they are planning to bring it forward. 

 

Mrs. Morrissey asked about the shrubs on the side.  Mrs. Lamb said they belong to the neighbor and they will remain.

 

Chairman Clayton asked if the roof will slope toward the neighbors.  Mrs. Lamb said yes.

 

Attorney Hirsch asked if the height will be 18’.  Mrs. Lamb said yes, at the peak. 

 

Mr. Zahorsky asked if the run-off will go out toward the street.  Mrs. Lamb said the run-off will go into the driveway and out to the street.

 

The application was open to the public.

 

Gail Ditri Story, 2169 Village Road, was sworn.  Ms. Story said the Lamb’s are great neighbors.  She said they are an asset to the neighborhood.

 

Mrs. DeSarno moved to approve the application as applied for.  Mrs. Morrissey seconded the motion which was unanimously approved by a roll call vote.  Mrs. DeSarno, Mrs. Morrissey, Messrs. Rembiszewski, Cinelli, Noorigian and Clayton voted yes.)


March 20, 2002                                                                                                           Page 7

 

MINUTES TO BE ADOPTED:  Mr. Noorigian moved to approve the minutes of the study sessions and regular minutes of March 6, 2002.  Mr. Cinelli seconded the motion, which was unanimously approved.

 

RESOLUTIONS TO BE MEMORIALIZED:

 

Attorney Hirsch stated Attorney Rubino prepared the Ken & Cindy Dellett resolution.

 

KEN AND CINDY DELLETT – BA#3-2002

Block 942, Lot 19                                                                    Cinelli/Noorigian

 

AMERADA HESS CORPORATION – BA#19-2001

Block 817, Lot 6                                                                      DeSarno/Noorigian

 

JOHN AND CAROLYN MATTONE – BA#1-2002

Block 752, Lot 41.06                                                               Noorigian/DeSarno

 

Mr. Noorigian announced the Board will meet the second and third Wednesday in April.

 

There being no further business to come before the Board, a motion was made, seconded, and unanimously approved to adjourn the meeting at 9:00 P.M.

 

                                                                        Respectfully submitted,

 

 

                                                                        Betty Schinestuhl

                    Recording Secretary